Back

Nonlinear Functional Network Connectivity In Resting fMRI Data

Motlaghian, S.; Belger, A.; Bustillo, J.; Ford, J.; Lim, K.; Mathalon, D.; Mueller, B.; Oleary, D.; Pearlson, G.; Potkin, S.; Preda, A.; Van Erp, T.; Calhoun, V.

2021-07-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.07.20.452982 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In this work, we focus on explicitly nonlinear relationships in functional networks. We introduce a technique using normalized mutual information (MI), that calculates the nonlinear correlation between different brain regions. We demonstrate our proposed approach using simulated data, then apply it to a dataset previously studied in (Damaraju et al., 2014). This resting-state fMRI data included 151 schizophrenia patients and 163 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. We first decomposed these data using group independent component analysis (ICA) and yielded 47 functionally relevant intrinsic connectivity networks. Our analysis showed a modularized nonlinear relationship among brain functional networks that was particularly noticeable in the sensory and visual cortex. Interestingly, the modularity appears both meaningful and distinct from that revealed by the linear approach. Group analysis identified significant differences in nonlinear dependencies between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls particularly in visual cortex, with controls showing more nonlinearity in most cases. Certain domains, including cognitive control, and default mode, appeared much less nonlinear, whereas links between the visual and other domains showed evidence of substantial nonlinear and modular properties. Overall, these results suggest that quantifying nonlinear dependencies of functional connectivity may provide a complementary and potentially important tool for studying brain function by exposing relevant variation that is typically ignored. Further, we propose a method that captures both linear and nonlinear effects in a boosted approach. This method increases the sensitivity to group differences in comparison to the standard linear approach, at the cost of being unable to separate linear and nonlinear effects.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Brain Connectivity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 1%
10.9%
3
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.8%
4
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
5
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.0%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
10
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
14
Brain Imaging and Behavior
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
16
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Brain Topography
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Schizophrenia Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Schizophrenia
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%