Breaching the curation bottleneck with human-machine reading symbiosis
Wong, C.; Rao, R.; Yin, T.; Statz, C.; Mockus, S.; Patterson, S.; Poon, H.
Show abstract
PurposeThe explosion of molecular biomarker and treatment information in the precision medicine era drastically exacerbated difficulty in identifying patient-relevant knowledge for clinical researchers and practitioners. Curated knowledgebases, such as the JAX Clinical Knowledgebase (CKB) are tools to organize and display knowledge in a readily accessible format; however, curators face the same challenges in comprehensively identifying clinically relevant information for curation. Natural language processing (NLP) has emerged as a promising direction for accelerating manual curation, but prior applications were often conceived as stand-alone efforts to automate curation, and the scope is often limited to simple entity and relation extraction. In this paper, we study the alternative paradigm of assisted curation and identify key desiderata to scale up knowledge curation with human-computer symbiosis. MethodsWe chose precision oncology for a case study and introduced self-supervised machine reading, which can automatically generate noisy training examples from unlabeled text. We developed a curation user interface (UI) for precision oncology and through iterative "curathons" (curation hackathons), conducted retrospective and prospective user studies for head-to-head comparison between manual and machine-assisted curation. ResultsContrary to the prevailing assumption, we showed that high recall is more important for end-to-end assisted curation. In extensive user studies, we showed that assisted curation can double the curation speed and increase the number of findings by an order of magnitude for previously scarcely curated drugs. ConclusionWe demonstrated that an iterative and thoughtful collaboration between professional curators and NLP researchers can facilitate rapid advances in assisted curation for precision medicine. Human-machine reading symbiosis can potentially be applicable to clinical care and research scenarios where curation is a major bottleneck.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- CoCoScore: Context-aware co-occurrence scoring for text mining applications using distant supervision 95%
- preon: Fast and accurate entity normalization for drug names and cancer types in precision oncology 95%
- AutoPM3: Enhancing Variant Interpretation via LLM-driven PM3 Evidence Extraction from Scientific Literature 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Integrative Analysis using the BioMedical Evidence Graph 93%
- DeepPhe-CR: Natural Language Processing Software Services for Cancer Registrar Case Abstraction 93%
- NCT Precision Oncology Thesaurus Drugs – a Curated Database for Drugs, Drug Classes, and Drug Targets in Precision Cancer Medicine 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Knowledge Extraction via Sparse Embedding Regression (KESER) with Multi-Center Large Scale Electronic Health Record Data 94%
- A Framework to Assess Clinical Safety and Hallucination Rates of LLMs for Medical Text Summarisation 93%
- Interpretable Fine-tuned Large Language Models Facilitate Making Genetic Test Decisions for Rare Diseases 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.