Back

scSGL: Signed Graph Learning for Single-Cell Gene Regulatory Network Inference

Karaaslanli, A.; Saha, S.; Aviyente, S.; Maiti, T.

2021-07-11 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.07.08.451697 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MotivationElucidating the topology of gene regulatory networks (GRNs) from large single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) datasets, while effectively capturing its inherent cell-cycle heterogeneity and dropouts, is currently one of the most pressing problems in computational systems biology. Recently, graph learning (GL) approaches based on graph signal processing (GSP) have been developed to infer graph topology from signals defined on graphs. However, existing GL methods are not suitable for learning signed graphs, which represent a characteristic feature of GRNs, as they account for both activating and inhibitory relationships between genes. They are also incapable of handling high proportion of zero values, which represent dropouts in single cell experiments. To this end, we propose a novel signed GL approach, scSGL, that learns GRNs based on the assumption of the smoothness and non-smoothness of gene expressions over activating and inhibitory edges, respectively. scSGL is then extended with kernels to take the nonlinearity of co-expressions into account and handle high proportion of dropouts. From GSP perspective, this extension corresponds to assuming smoothness/non-smoothness of graph signals in a higher dimensional space defined by the kernel. The proposed approach is formulated as a non-convex optimization problem and solved using an efficient ADMM framework. ResultsIn our experiments on simulated and real single cell datasets, scSGL compares favorably with other single cell gene regulatory network reconstruction algorithms. AvailabilityThe scSGL code and analysis scripts are available at (https://github.com/Single-Cell-Graph-Learning/scSGL).

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.