Back

The multilayered organization of water-soluble proteins

Wang, L.

2021-07-08 biophysics
10.1101/2021.07.07.451496 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The structural analysis of proteins has focused primarily on secondary structure, three-dimensional fold and active site while whole surface has been analyzed to a lesser extent and interior has not received much attention. Here we present an analysis of both the surfaces and the interiors of a set of water-soluble monomeric proteins in terms of solvent-excluded surface (SES) and atomic partial charge. The analysis shows that the surface of a soluble monomer has a net negative charge and is much smoother than the interior. Most interestingly with regard to both atomic partial charge and SES-defined geometric property there exists a multilayered organization from the exterior to the interior of a soluble monomer. The multilayered organization is closely related to protein-solvent interaction and should be a general feature of a water-soluble protein. Particularly the multilayered organization may set an upper limit for the size of a water-soluble monomer and plays an important role in the determination of its overall shape in solution. Significance statementThe analysis of the solvent-excluded surfaces (SESs) of a large set of water-soluble monomers with crystal structures shows that in any soluble monomer there exists a multilayered organization in terms of SES-defined electric and geometric properties. It means that the atoms in a soluble monomer are not randomly distributed but organized into successive layers to optimize its interaction with solvent molecules. The SES-derived multi-layered organization should be a general feature of a water-soluble protein and likely plays a vital role in its solvation, folding and structure.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.