Back

Hypervariable-Locus Melting Typing (HLMT): a novel, fast and inexpensive sequencing-free approach to pathogen typing based on High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis

Perini, M.; Piazza, A.; Panelli, S.; Papaleo, S.; Alvaro, A.; Vailati, F.; Corbella, M.; Saluzzo, F.; Gona, F.; Castelli, D.; Farina, C.; Marone, P.; Cirillo, D. M.; Cavallero, A.; Zuccotti, G. V.; Comandatore, F.

2021-07-01 microbiology
10.1101/2021.07.01.450706 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesSubspecies pathogen typing is a pivotal tool to detect the emergence of high-risk clones in hospital settings and to limit their spreading among patients. Unfortunately, the most used subspecies typing methods (i.e. Pulsed-field Gel Electrophoresis - PFGE, Multi-Locus Sequence Typing - MLST and Whole Genome Sequencing - WGS) are too expensive and time consuming to be suitable for real-time surveillance. Here we present Hypervariable-Locus Melting Typing (HLMT), a novel subspecies typing approach based on High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis, which allows pathogen typing in a few hours and with [~]5 euros per sample. MethodsHLMT types the strains by clustering them using melting temperatures (HLMT-clustering) and/or by assigning them to Melting Types (MTs) on the basis of a reference dataset (HLMT-assignment). We applied HLMT (clustering and typing) to 134 Klebsiella pneumoniae strains collected during outbreaks or surveillance programs in four hospitals. Then, we compared HLMT typing results to PFGE, MLST and WGS. ResultsHLMT-clustering distinguishes most of the K. pneumoniae high-risk clones with a sensitivity comparable to PFGE and MLST. It also drawed surveillance epidemiological curves comparable to those obtained by MLST, PFGE and WGS typing. Furthermore, the results obtained by HLMT-assignment were coherent to MLST for 96% of the typed strains with a Jaccard index of 0.912. ConclusionsHLMT is a fast and scalable method for pathogen typing, suitable for real-time hospital microbiological surveillance. HLMT is also inexpensive and thus it is applicable to infection control programs in low-middle income countries.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.