Efficacy, safety, and lot to lot immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (BBV152): a double-blind, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial
Ella, R.; Reddy, S.; Blackwelder, W.; Potdar, V.; Yadav, P.; Sarangi, V.; Aileni, V. K.; Kanungo, S.; Rai, S.; Reddy, P.; Verma, S.; Singh, C.; Redkar, S.; Mohapatra, S.; Pandey, A.; Ranganadin, P.; Gumashta, R.; Multani, M.; Mohammad, S.; Bhatt, P.; Kumari, L.; Sapkal, G.; Gupta, N.; Abraham, P.; Panda, S.; Prasad, S.; Bhargava, B.; Ella, K.; Vadrevu, K. M.; COVAXIN Study Group,
Show abstract
BackgroundWe report the clinical efficacy against COVID-19 infection of BBV152, a whole-virion inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine formulated with a Toll-like receptor 7/8 agonist molecule adsorbed to alum (Algel-IMDG). MethodsWe did a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 clinical trial in 25 Indian hospitals to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and immunological lot consistency of BBV152. Healthy adults (age 18-98 years) randomised 1:1 using a computer-generated randomisation scheme received two intramuscular doses of vaccine or placebo administered four weeks apart. The primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed symptomatic COVID-19, occurring at least 14 days after the second dose. Secondary outcomes were efficacy in sub-groups for age (18-< 60 years and [≥] 60 years) and in participants with pre-existing stable medical conditions. We also evaluated safety, reactogenicity, and consistency of immune responses for three consecutive manufacturing lots. FindingsBetween November 16, 2020 and January 7, 2021 we recruited 25,798 participants who were randomised to BBV152 or placebo groups; 24,419 received two doses of BBV152 (n = 12,221) or placebo (n = 12,198). In a case-driven analysis, 130 cases of symptomatic COVID-19 were reported in 16,973 (0{middle dot}77%) participants with follow-up at least two weeks after the second vaccination; 24 occurred in the vaccine group and 106 in placebo recipients giving an overall vaccine efficacy of 77{middle dot}8% (95% CI: 65{middle dot}2-86{middle dot}4). Sixteen cases, one vaccinee and 15 placebo recipients, met the severe symptomatic COVID-19 case definition giving a vaccine efficacy of 93{middle dot}4% (57{middle dot}1-99{middle dot}8). Efficacy against asymptomatic COVID-19 was 63{middle dot}6% (29{middle dot}0-82{middle dot}4). BBV152 conferred 65{middle dot}2% (95% CI: 33{middle dot}1-83{middle dot}0) protection against the SARS-CoV-2 Variant of Concern, B.1.617.2 (Delta). BBV152 was well tolerated with no clinically or statistically significant differences in the distributions of solicited, unsolicited, or serious adverse events between vaccine and placebo groups. No cases of anaphylaxis or vaccine-related deaths were reported. InterpretationBBV152 was immunogenic and highly efficacious against symptomatic and asymptomatic COVID-19 variant associated disease, particularly against severe disease in adults. Vaccination was well tolerated with an overall incidence of adverse events observed over a median of 146 days that was lower than that observed with other COVID-19 vaccines. FundingThis work was supported and funded by Bharat Biotech International Limited and partly co-funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04641481
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and Safety of Booster Dose of S-268019-b or Tozinameran in Japanese Participants: An Interim Report of Phase 2/3, Randomized, Observer-Blinded, Noninferiority Study 98%
- Safety and Immunogenicity of an Inactivated Recombinant Newcastle Disease Virus Vaccine Expressing SARS-CoV-2 Spike: A Randomised, Comparator-Controlled, Phase 2 Trial 97%
- Humoral and cellular immune responses after 6 months of a heterologous SARS-CoV-2 booster with the protein-based PHH-1V vaccine in a phase IIb trial 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity clinical trial of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBV152 (a phase 2, double-blind, randomised controlled trial) and the persistence of immune responses from a phase 1 follow-up report 98%
- Safety and immunogenicity of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant protein vaccine with AS03 adjuvant in healthy adults: interim findings from a phase 2, randomised, dose-finding, multi-centre study 98%
- A Phase 1: Safety and Immunogenicity Trial of an Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine-BBV152 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and efficacy of two immunization schedules with an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in adults. A randomized non-inferiority clinical trial 98%
- Post-vaccination neutralization responses to Omicron sub-variants 96%
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a new SARS-CoV-2 recombinant Gamma variant RBD-based protein adjuvanted vaccine, used as heterologous booster in healthy adults: a Phase 1 interim report 97%
- Higher serological responses and increased vaccine effectiveness demonstrate the value of extended vaccine schedules in combatting COVID-19 in England 96%
- Duration of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in Qatar 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.