Longitudinal testing for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in day care centers in Hesse, Germany, during increased local incidence and with VOC Alpha as dominant variant: Results of the SAFE KiDS 2 and SAFE KiDS 3 study
Schenk, B.; Hoehl, S.; Rudych, O.; Kreutzer, E.; Menger, D.; Farmand, S.; Gebert, D.; Flohr, M.; Berger, F.; Wrobel, F.; Weigel, V.; Kortenbusch, M.; Berger, A.; Ciesek, S.
Show abstract
In the summer of 2020, we investigated the rate of inapparent shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in a representative sample of day care centers from Hesse, Germany, and found a low positivity rate during a period of low local community spread. To investigate the influence of a high local incidence setting, we conducted the SAFE KiDS 2 study. 577 children and 334 staff members of 47 day care centers were tested for respiratory and gastrointestinal shedding of SARS-CoV-2, and three infections with SARS-CoV-2 in the infectious period were detected. We conclude that viral shedding occurred infrequently while the original "wild-type" variant was dominant. The more transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variant Alpha (B.1.1.7) became the dominant strain after SAFE KiDS 2 was concluded. The SAFE KiDS 3 study investigated the impact of the Alpha variant of SARS-CoV-2 on inapparent viral shedding in the day care setting. In this study, 756 children and 226 staff members from 46 day care centers provided self-collected saliva swabs, the so-called "Lollipop" swabs, which were tested by RT-PCR. In the four-week study period, none of the participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, demonstrating that inapparent shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in the day care setting was also rare during the dominance of the Alpha variant. The influence of the variant of concern Delta on day care centers has yet to be studied.
Matching journals
The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated risk factors among frontline health care workers in Paris, France: the SEROCOV prospective cohort study 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 serology in 4000 health care and administrative staff across seven sites in Lombardy, Italy 92%
- Kinetics and seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies – a comparison of 3 different assays 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in adolescent students and their teachers in Saxony, Germany (SchoolCoviDD19): persistent low seroprevalence and transmission rates between May and October 2020 95%
- Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic individuals using the Panbio™ COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (Abbott) compared to RT-qPCR 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among Vancouver public school staff in British Columbia, Canada 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance Evaluation Of A SARS-COV-2 Rapid Antigentest: Test Performance In The Community In The Netherlands 94%
- Real-life clinical sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test in symptomatic patients 94%
- Evaluation of the accuracy and ease-of-use of Abbott PanBio - A WHO emergency use listed, rapid, antigen-detecting point-of-care diagnostic test for SARS-CoV-2 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Susceptibility and infectiousness of children and adults with SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 deduced from three daycare centre outbreaks and related household situations; Germany, 2021 94%
- SARS-CoV-2 infection in primary schools in northern France: A retrospective cohort study in an area of high transmission 93%
- Seroprevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 virus in the adult Norwegian population, winter 2020/2021: pre-vaccination period 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-life validation of the Panbio COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test (Abbott) in community-dwelling subjects with symptoms of potential SARS-CoV-2 infection 94%
- Pooled Surveillance Testing Program for Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infections in K-12 Schools and Universities 93%
- Antibody persistence and neutralising activity in primary school students and staff: prospective active surveillance, June to December 2020, England 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.