Back

Aliquoting of isobaric labeling reagents for low concentration and single cell proteomics samples

Yuan, Y.; Orsburn, B. C.

2021-06-23 biochemistry
10.1101/2021.06.23.449560 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The introduction of isobaric tagging reagents enabled more accurate, high-throughput quantitative proteomics by enabling multiple samples to be multiplexed. One drawback of these workflows is the relative expense of the proprietary isobaric reagents, which is often only second to the expense of the instruments themselves. These highly reactive chemical tags are only commercially available in relatively large aliquots compared to the typical amounts of peptides analyzed in proteomic workflows today. Excess reagents are typically disposed of following a single labeling experiment or those performed within a few days of opening a new kit. We present a simple procedure to aliquot commercial isobaric tagging reagents and demonstrate the successful and high efficiency labeling of multiple samples over a period of six months. The samples presented herein were selected as the most diverse ones labeled by prepared aliquots from a single labeling reagent kit over this period. We observe comparable labeling efficiency from 100 microgram to 100 picograms of peptide when labeling samples from both human digest standards, cancer cell lines prepared in-house and from cells directly obtained from human organ donors, despite differences in cell type, lysis, and digestion procedures. No labeling experiment of whole human proteomics samples achieved less than 92% labeling efficiency over this period. When preparing phosphoproteomic samples 6 months after the date of the aliquoting procedure, we observed a decrease in labeling efficiency to approximately 86%, indicating the end of the useful lifetime of aliquots prepared in this manner. Over this period, we have effectively reduced the reagent costs of each experiment to less than 10% of the predicted costs when following the manufacturer instructions for use and disposal. While aliquoting of reagents can be performed by hand, we provide a complete template for automatic aliquoting using an affordable liquid handling robot, including plans for 3D printing of two parts we have found useful for streamlining this procedure. Abstract Graphic O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=197 HEIGHT=200 SRC="FIGDIR/small/449560v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (51K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@18cd7eeorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1b48065org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@159761forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@5a0896_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
14.8%
2
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
14.8%
3
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
HardwareX
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
6
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Protocols
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.6%
9
Current Protocols
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
10
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
14
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
23
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
24
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%