Back

Importance of adequate COVID-19 case definitions in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic

Nunez, I.; Caro-Vega, Y.; Belaunzaran-Zamudio, P. F.

2021-06-15 epidemiology
10.1101/2021.06.13.21258845 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEpidemiologic case definitions serve a myriad of purposes during a pandemic, including contact tracing and monitoring disease trends. It is unknown how any COVID-19 case definition fares against the current gold standard of molecular or antigen tests. MethodsWe calculated the diagnostic properties of five COVID-19 definitions (three of the Mexican government and two of the WHO) using open data of suspected COVID-19 cases in Mexico City from March 24th 2020 until January 31st 2021. ResultsAll 1,632,420 people included in the analysis met the WHO suspected case definition (sensitivity 100%, specificity 0%). The WHO probable case definition was met by 1.4%, while the first and second Mexican suspected case had sensitivities of 61 and 62% and specificities of 58 and 62%, respectively. Confirmed case by epidemiological contact had a low sensitivity (33%) but slightly higher specificity (77%). ConclusionsCase definitions should maximize sensitivity, especially in a high-transmission area such as Mexico City. The WHO suspected case definition has the potential for detecting most symptomatic cases. We underline the need for routine evaluation of case definitions as new evidence arises to maximize their usefulness.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.