Back

Hybridization potential between Amaranthus tuberculatus and Amaranthus albus

Murphy, B. P.; Chatham, L. A.; McCormick, D. M.; Tranel, P. J.

2021-06-11 plant biology
10.1101/2021.06.11.448086 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The genus Amaranthus is composed of numerous annual herbs, several of which are primary driver weeds within annual production agricultural systems. In particular, Amaranthus tuberculatus, a dioecious species, is noteworthy for rapid growth rates, high fecundity, and an expanding geographic distribution. Interspecific hybridization within and between the subgenera Amaranthus and Acnidia is reported both in controlled environment and field studies, however a gap in knowledge exists with the subgenus Albersia. Interspecific hybridization may contribute to genetic diversity, and may contribute to the current range expansion of A. tuberculatus. Recently, a herbicide resistance survey of A. tuberculatus across five Midwestern states reported alleles of PPX2 similar to sequences of Amaranthus albus, a monoecious species. Here, we seek to generate empirical data for the hybridization potential of A. albus and A. tuberculatus through replicated, controlled crosses in a greenhouse. Of 65,000 progeny screened from A. albus grown with A. tuberculatus males, three were confirmed as hybrids. Hybrids were dioecious, possessed phenotypic traits of both species, and had limited to no fertility. DNA content analysis of backcross progeny suggested a polyploid state may be required for hybrid formation. Screening of 120 progeny of A. tuberculatus females grown with A. albus identified no hybrids, though a skew to female progeny was observed. The female skew may be due to apomixis or auto-pollination, the spontaneous generation of male flowers on otherwise female plants. Our results indicate that introgression between A. albus and A. tuberculatus will occur less frequently than what has often been reported from hybridization studies with different pairs of Amaranthus species.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
4
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
6
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
8
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
11
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
13
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
18
AoB PLANTS
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
22
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
25
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%