Back

A new method to identify global targets of RNA-binding proteins in plants

Cheng, Y.-L.; Hsieh, H.-Y.; Tu, S.-L.

2021-06-11 plant biology
10.1101/2021.06.11.448000 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) play crucial roles in various aspects of post-transcriptional gene expression; their functions can vary between tissues, cell types, developmental stages, and environmental conditions. Identifying RBP target RNAs and investigating whether they are differentially bound by RBPs in different cell types, stages, or conditions could shed light on RBP functions. Although several strategies have been designed to identify RBP targets, they involve complicated biochemical steps and require large quantities of material, and only a few studies using these techniques have been performed in plants. The TRIBE (targets of RNA binding proteins identified by editing) method was recently developed to identify RBP targets using a RBP coupled to the catalytic domain of a Drosophila RNA editing enzyme and expressing this fusion protein in vivo. The resulting novel editing events can be identified by sequencing. This technique uses little material and does not require complex biochemical steps, however it is not yet adapted for use in plants. ResultsWe successfully applied an optimized genome-wide TRIBE method in plants. We selected the splicing regulator polypyrimidine tract-binding protein (PTB) as a model protein for testing the TRIBE system in the moss Physcomitrium patens. We demonstrated that 13.81% of protein-coding gene transcripts in P. patens are targets of PTB. Most potential PTB binding sites are located in coding sequences and 3 untranslated regions, suggesting that PTB performs multiple functions besides pre-mRNA splicing in this moss. In addition, TRIBE showed reproducible results compared to other methods. ConclusionsWe have developed an alternative method based on the TRIBE system to identify RBP targets in plants globally, and we provide guidance here for its application in plants.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.0%
2
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.2%
3
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
6
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
7
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
10
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
12
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
13
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
14
Plant Cell Reports
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
16
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
19
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
20
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
24
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
36 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
26
RNA Biology
70 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
STAR Protocols
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
30
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%