Back

A New Saliva-Based Lateral-Flow SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Test for mRNA Vaccination

Shan, D.; Hsiung, J.; Bliden, K. P.; Zhao, S.; Liao, T.; Wang, G.; Tan, S.; Liu, T.; Sreedhar, D.; Kost, J.; Chang, S. T.; Yuan, W. P.; Tantry, U.; Gurbel, P.; Tang, M.; Dai, H.

2021-06-16 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.06.11.21258769
Show abstract

Sensitive detection of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is important to assessing immune responses to viral infection or vaccination and immunity duration. Antibody assays using non-invasive body fluids such as saliva could facilitate mass testing including young children, elderly and those who resist blood draws, and easily allowing longitudinal testing/monitoring of antibodies over time. Here, we developed a new lateral flow (nLF) assay that sensitively detects SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the saliva samples of vaccinated individuals and previous COVID-19 patients. The 25-minute nLF assay detected anti-spike protein (anti-S1) IgG in saliva samples with 100% specificity and high sensitivity from both vaccinated (99.51% for samples [≥] 19 days post 1st Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA vaccine dose) and infected individuals. Antibodies against nucleocapsid protein (anti-NCP) was detected only in the saliva samples of COVID-19 patients and not in vaccinated samples, allowing facile differentiation of vaccination from infection. SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 IgG antibody in saliva measured by nLF demonstrated similar evolution trends post vaccination to that in matching dried blood spot (DBS) samples measured by a quantitative pGOLD lab-test, enabling the nLF to be a valid tool for non-invasive personalized monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 antibody persistence. The new salivary rapid test platform can be applied for non-invasive detection of antibodies against infection and vaccination in a wide range of diseases.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 0.6%
12.4%
2
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 17%
10.0%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 59%
7.4%
4
Clinical Chemistry
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 17%
4.6%
6
Journal of Virological Methods
based on 20 papers
Top 0.5%
4.4%
7
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
based on 13 papers
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
Diagnostics
based on 36 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
9
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 0.9%
2.4%
10
Analytical Chemistry
based on 15 papers
Top 0.5%
2.3%
11
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
based on 11 papers
Top 0.2%
2.3%
12
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
2.2%
13
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 3%
1.7%
14
The Journal of Immunology
based on 19 papers
Top 1%
1.5%
15
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 137 papers
Top 7%
1.5%
16
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 13%
1.3%
17
eBioMedicine
based on 82 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
18
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
19
mSphere
based on 27 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
20
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
21
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
22
Science Translational Medicine
based on 40 papers
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
based on 15 papers
Top 0.4%
1.2%
24
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
based on 24 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
25
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 20%
0.8%
27
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
28
Emerging Microbes & Infections
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 19%
0.8%
30
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 12%
0.7%