Back

A New Saliva-Based Lateral-Flow SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Test for mRNA Vaccination

Shan, D.; Hsiung, J.; Bliden, K. P.; Zhao, S.; Liao, T.; Wang, G.; Tan, S.; Liu, T.; Sreedhar, D.; Kost, J.; Chang, S. T.; Yuan, W. P.; Tantry, U.; Gurbel, P.; Tang, M.; Dai, H.

2021-06-16 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.06.11.21258769 medRxiv
Show abstract

Sensitive detection of IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 is important to assessing immune responses to viral infection or vaccination and immunity duration. Antibody assays using non-invasive body fluids such as saliva could facilitate mass testing including young children, elderly and those who resist blood draws, and easily allowing longitudinal testing/monitoring of antibodies over time. Here, we developed a new lateral flow (nLF) assay that sensitively detects SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the saliva samples of vaccinated individuals and previous COVID-19 patients. The 25-minute nLF assay detected anti-spike protein (anti-S1) IgG in saliva samples with 100% specificity and high sensitivity from both vaccinated (99.51% for samples [≥] 19 days post 1st Pfizer/BioNTech or Moderna mRNA vaccine dose) and infected individuals. Antibodies against nucleocapsid protein (anti-NCP) was detected only in the saliva samples of COVID-19 patients and not in vaccinated samples, allowing facile differentiation of vaccination from infection. SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 IgG antibody in saliva measured by nLF demonstrated similar evolution trends post vaccination to that in matching dried blood spot (DBS) samples measured by a quantitative pGOLD lab-test, enabling the nLF to be a valid tool for non-invasive personalized monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 antibody persistence. The new salivary rapid test platform can be applied for non-invasive detection of antibodies against infection and vaccination in a wide range of diseases.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.