A Survey of the Smokefree Status of Pedestrian-Only Spaces in 10 New Zealand Local Government Areas
Wilson, N.; Gurram, N.; Grout, L. M.; Thomson, G.
Show abstract
AimTo describe the smokefree status and signage of outdoor pedestrian-only plazas/malls/boulevards in 10 New Zealand local government (council) areas. MethodsThe 10 council areas were a convenience sample. Council websites were examined for smokefree policies and a systematic attempt was made to identify the five largest pedestrian-only sites with permanent seating in each council area (10 sites each for two larger cities). Field visits were conducted to all selected sites. ResultsSmokefree policies with components covering smokefree outdoor plazas/malls/boulevards were common (80%; 8/10 councils), albeit with some gaps (eg, around signage and vaping policy). A total of 60 relevant pedestrianised sites with permanent seating were identified and surveyed. Of these 63% were officially designated smokefree. Smokefree signage was only present in 15% (9/60) of all the sites and in 24% (9/38) of the designated smokefree sites. In these designated sites the average number of smokefree signs was only 1.4 (range: 0 to 14). Issues identified with the signs included small size, being only a small part of a larger other sign, limited use of te reo M[a]ori wording, and not covering vaping. At sites where tables were present, 12% had ash trays on the tables (none where smokefree). ConclusionsSmokefree plazas/malls/boulevards in this survey had multiple policy and signage deficiencies that are inconsistent with achieving the national smokefree goal for 2025. There is scope to address these issues with an upgrade to the national smokefree law.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Smoking in social housing among adults in England, 2015-2020: a nationally representative survey 93%
- Describing the inputs, activities and outputs of "10,000 Lives", a coordinated regional smoking cessation initiative in Central Queensland, Australia 92%
- COVID-19 risk perceptions of social interaction and essential activities and inequity in the United States: Results from a nationally representative survey 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neighborhood level factors and use of cigarettes, cannabis and e-cigarettes: a population-based study among Canadian adults 93%
- Factors associated with secondhand smoke exposure among non-smoking employees in the workplace: A cross-sectional study in Qingdao, China 92%
- E-cigarette use and Respiratory Symptoms in Residents of the United States: A BRFSS Report 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing Compliance with Smoke-Free Laws in Purbakhola Rural Municipality, Nepal: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study 94%
- Let’s just ask them. Perspectives on urban dwelling and air quality: a cross-sectional survey of 3,222 children, young people and parents 93%
- Air pollution exposure, respiratory consequences, and perceptions among urban African children living in poor conditions – a case study in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- InterMob: A 24-month randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of an intervention including behavioural change techniques and free transport versus an intervention including air pollution awareness-raising on car use reduction among regular car users living in Grenoble, France 91%
- Characterization of Trajectories of Physical Activity and Cigarette Smoking from Early Adolescence to Adulthood 91%
- Youth susceptibility to tobacco use: Is it general or specific? 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.