A comprehensive investigation of m6A regulators prognostic value and associated molecular pathways in breast invasive cancer
Demircan, T.; Yavuz, M.; Akgul, S.
Show abstract
Breast invasive cancer (BIC) is one of the most commonly observed and the deadliest cancer among women. Despite the progress that has been made in improving breast cancer outcomes by the development of advanced treatment options, due to the heterogeneity and complexity of the disease, more studies are required to explore underlying molecular mechanisms of breast cancer which may provide useful insights to overcome the constraints related to current therapeutic options. The goal of this study was to reveal the crucial roles of m6A regulatory proteins in BIC development using various publicly available datasets and databases. We first conducted a comprehensive analysis to depict the mutation frequency and types for m6A regulatory genes in sub-types of BIC for the evaluation of the genetic alterations landscape of breast cancer. Changes in expression levels of m6A regulatory factors were identified as the key genetic alteration in BIC. Implementation of Kaplan-Meier tool to assess the predictive value of m6A pathway components in BIC validated the use of VIRMA, METTL14, RBM15B, EIF3B, YTHDF1, and YTHDF3 as prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer. We then examined the enriched gene ontology (GO) terms and KEGG pathways for the tumor samples with genetic alterations in the m6A pathway. Dysregulation of m6A regulatory factors in BIC was associated with cell division and survival-related pathways such as nuclear division and chromosome segregation via the upregulation of the genes functioning in these biological processes and the gained overactivity of these pathways may account for poor prognosis of the disease. The performed analyses highlighted m6A pathway genes as potential regulators of BIC growth and as a valuable set to be utilized as clinical biomarkers in BIC disease.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Glyoxalase 1: emerging biomarker and therapeutic target in cervical cancer progression 96%
- Identification of cuproptosis and ferroptosis-related subtypes and development of a prognostic signature in colon cancer 95%
- The novel microRNAs hsa-miR-nov7 and hsa-miR-nov3 are over-expressed in locally advanced breast cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unveiling epigenetic regulatory elements associated with breast cancer development 97%
- Regulation Network of Colorectal Cancer Specific Enhancers in Progression of Colorectal Cancer 95%
- Immunohistochemical Profiling of Histone Modification Biomarkers Identifies Subtype-Specific Epigenetic Signatures and Potential Drug Targets in Breast Cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular pathways associated with Kallikrein 6 overexpression in colorectal cancer 96%
- TCGA Pan-Cancer genomic analysis of Alternative Lengthening of Telomeres (ALT) related genes 95%
- Structural variability, expression profile and pharmacogenetics properties of TMPRSS2 gene as a potential target for COVID-19 therapy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a six-RNA binding proteins prognostic signature and candidate drugs for prostate cancer 96%
- Gene expression profiles and pathway enrichment analysis to identification of differentially expressed gene and signaling pathways in epithelial ovarian cancer based on high-throughput RNA-seq data 95%
- Genome-wide interologous interactome map (TeaGPIN) of Camellia sinensis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification models for Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Progression, based on gene expression data-trained supervised machine learning 96%
- Immune Classification of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma 94%
- Discovering Key Transcriptomic Regulators in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma using Dirichlet Process Gaussian Mixture Model 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.