How do packet losses affect measures of averaged neural signals?
Dastin-van Rijn, E.; Harrison, M.; Borton, D. A.
Show abstract
Recent advances in implanted device development have enabled chronic streaming of neural data to external devices allowing for long timescale, naturalistic recordings. However, characteristic data losses occur during wireless transmission. Estimates for the duration of these losses are typically uncertain reducing signal quality and impeding analyses. To characterize the effect of these losses on recovery of averaged neural signals, we simulated neural time series data for a typical event-related potential (ERP) experiment. We investigated how the signal duration and the degree of timing uncertainty affected the offset of the ERP, its duration in time, its amplitude, and the ability to resolve small differences corresponding to different task conditions. Simulations showed that long timescale signals were generally robust to the effects of packet losses apart from timing offsets while short timescale signals were significantly delocalized and attenuated. These results provide clarity on the types of signals that can be resolved using these datasets and provide clarity on the restrictions imposed by data losses on typical analyses.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust assessment of the cortical encoding of word-level expectations using the temporal response function 95%
- Post-Stimulus Encoding of Decision Confidence in EEG: Toward a Brain-Computer Interface for Decision Making 95%
- Short-Delay Neurofeedback Facilitates Training of the Parietal Alpha Rhythm 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Steady state evoked potential (SSEP) responses in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices of anesthetized cats: nonlinearity characterized by harmonic and intermodulation frequencies 95%
- Predictors for Estimating Subcortical EEG Responses to Continuous Speech 95%
- Stimulus-induced narrow-band gamma oscillations in humans can be recorded using open-hardware low-cost EEG amplifier 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal Multichannel Artifact Prediction and Removal for Brain Machine Interfaces and Neural Prosthetics 94%
- Quantification of Phase-Amplitude Coupling in Neuronal Oscillations: Comparison of Phase-Locking Value, Mean Vector Length, and Modulation Index 93%
- Endogenous signals during active movement predict deep brain stimulation evoked potential pathways: Results of a transfer function analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.