Back

Description of the sound diversity of two species of tuco-tucos (Ctenomys torquatus and Ctenomys lami ) in natural environment

Zache, K. C.; Machado Silveira, L.; Francescoli, G.; Ochotorena de Freitas, T. R.

2021-06-01 animal behavior and cognition
10.1101/2021.06.01.446534 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sound signals can travel through long distances, becoming an important communication channel between animals that need to establish contact beyond the visual form. They can then be considered a relevant form of communication between species living in the underground environment. Ctenomys torquatus and Ctenomys lami are solitary subterranean rodents, thus demanding an improvement of the communicative channels, especially in territorial defense actions and meeting potential reproductive partners. This work was aimed to describe the variability of acoustic signals emitted by C. torquatus and C. lami by analyzing the physical-morphological characteristics of the signals. The study was carried out in two populations, one of each species and was selected 14 individuals of C. torquatus and 15 C. lami. The acoustic signals were recorded in a natural environment, obtaining the sounds straight from the animal tunnels. A total of 1,380 signals were captured and analyzed, 786 from C. torquatus and 594 from C. lami. It was possible to characterize 5 different types of signals, emitted by both species. Most of the analyzed sequences presented low frequency, and many of these calls exhibited characteristics of long-range signals. It was verified a sharing of sound signals in both species, as regarding the acoustic parameters as the morphology of the analyzed spectrograms. For the first time, it was possible to have access to sound data emitted by direct subterranean rodents from their tunnels in the natural environment.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.