Development and operationalization of an electronic palliative care registry in a large integrated health system
Sudat, S. E.; Blanton, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundPalliative care teams generally lack prospective tools to identify individuals who could benefit from specialty palliative care, which hinders their ability to find and treat patients early in their illness trajectories. Health systems are also limited in their ability to assess how well their palliative care services reach the population in need, which in turn makes it much more difficult to determine the quality, value, and effectiveness of those services. This study describes the creation, validation, and operationalization of an electronic registry of patients potentially eligible for palliative care at Sutter Health, a large integrated health system in northern California, US. ResultsThe electronic palliative care eligibility algorithm performed well within the chart review validation sample, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.903 and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.545. Within the 2.4 million individuals who contacted the SH electronic health record (EHR) during 2017, the final algorithm identified 1.1%-1.8% of patients (26,773-42,847) as potentially eligible for palliative care services. This included approximately 12.9%-17.7% of inpatients (16,392-22,507 out of 126,916), and 1.2%-1.9% of ambulatory care patients (20,140-32,212 out of 1.7 million). ConclusionsA palliative care electronic patient registry was successfully created and operationalized. Performance based on an extensive chart review sample of Sutter Health patients indicated good capture of the palliative care-appropriate population, and this is further supported by successful identification of a majority of enrollees in Sutter Healths palliative care programs during 2017.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 93%
- Essential Indicators of Quality in Primary Care Settings: An Evidence-Based, Structured, Expert Approach 93%
- Clinical code sets and the problem of redundancy in code set repositories 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a customised data management system for a COVID-19-adapted colorectal cancer pathway 92%
- Measures of socioeconomic advantage are not independent predictors of support for healthcare AI: subgroup analysis of a national Australian survey 91%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 94%
- Assessing the Safety of Home Oximetry for Covid-19: A multi-site retrospective observational study 93%
- Modelling Palliative and End of Life resource requirements during COVID-19: implications for quality care 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a Derived International Patient Severity Algorithm to Support COVID-19 Analytics from Electronic Health Record Data 93%
- Clinical Utility of Automatable Prediction Models for Improving Palliative and End-Of-Life Care Outcomes: Towards Routine Decision Analysis Before Implementation 92%
- Real-Time Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Response and role of palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national telephone survey of hospices in Italy 92%
- Unwelcome memento mori or best clinical practice? Community end-of-life anticipatory medication prescribing practice: a mixed methods observational study 92%
- Models, components, and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic review of reviews 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.