Impact of Sepsis Identification and Treatment Time on In-Hospital Mortality, Length of Stay, and Hours in the Intensive Care Unit
Sudat, S. E.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to examine the impact of timely treatment and identification of sepsis on patient outcomes at Sutter Health, a mixed-payer healthcare system in northern California, US. MethodsThis observational, retrospective analysis considered electronic health record (EHR) data for individuals who presented with sepsis during 2016-17 at any of Sutter Healths 22 emergency departments (ED). Impacts were assessed for the timing of broad-spectrum antibiotic and intravenous (IV) fluid initiation, first vital signs, sepsis screening, and lactate results. Outcomes were in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS) and intensive care unit (ICU) hours for patients discharged alive. ResultsThe final sample size was 35,847 (N=9,638 severe sepsis, N=5,309 septic shock). Early fluid initiation had the largest estimated impacts: a mortality reduction of 2.85%[2.03%,3.68%] overall and 2.94%[1.44%,4.48%] for severe sepsis (within 1 hour of sepsis presentation), and 14.66%[9.23%,20.07%] for septic shock (within 3 hours); reduced LOS (days) 1.39[1.08,1.71] overall, 2.30[1.31,3.21] severe sepsis, 3.07[1.21,4.94] septic shock; and fewer ICU hours 25.93[16.95,34.66] overall, 35.06[14.7,56.99] severe sepsis, 41.99[15.70,70.68] septic shock (within 3 hours). Sepsis screening within 30 minutes was also associated with mortality reductions (3.88%[2.96%,4.90%] overall, 1.74%[0.08%,3.50%] severe sepsis, 6.78%[3.12%,10.33%] septic shock). The greatest improvement opportunity was estimated for joint initiation of antibiotics and IV fluids, with a modest additional mortality reduction of 0.80%[0.47%,1.17%] overall, 0.77%[0.34%,1.19%] severe sepsis, 2.94%[1.83%,3.97%] septic shock; LOS reduction of 0.37[0.28,0.46] overall, 0.29[0.17,0.43] severe sepsis, 0.25[0.01,0.51] septic shock (within 1 hour); ICU hours reduction of 4.85[3.26,6.57] overall, 5.07[2.55,7.67] severe sepsis, 3.85[1.69,6.24] septic shock (within 3 hours).
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Sepsis Treatment Algorithm to Improve Early Antibiotic De-escalation While Maintaining Adequacy of Coverage (Early-IDEAS): A Prospective Observational Study 96%
- Application of the Sepsis-3 criteria to describe sepsis epidemiology in the AmsterdamUMCdb intensive care dataset 95%
- Derivation and validation of a triage tool for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19: The PRIEST observational cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 94%
- ABCDEF Bundle Implementation: The influence of access to bundle-enhancing supplies and equipment 92%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 as cause of viral sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 93%
- Accuracy of a Risk Alert Threshold for ICU Hypoglycemia: Retrospective Analysis of Alert Performance and Association with Clinical Deterioration Events 92%
- An international factorial vignette-based survey of intubation decisions in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Calprotectin as a sepsis diagnostic marker in critical care: a retrospective observational study 94%
- COMPARISON OF sPLA2-IIA PERFORMANCE WITH HIGH-SENSITIVE CRP, NEUTROPHIL PERCENTAGE, PCT AND LACTATE TO IDENTIFY BACTERIAL INFECTION: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY 93%
- Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of automated computer aided-risk score for predicting the risk of in-hospital mortality using first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs for COVID-19 hospital admissions: a retrospective development and validation study 93%
- Use of the first National Early Warning Score recorded within 24 hours of admission to estimate the risk of in-hospital mortality in unplanned COVID-19 patients: a retrospective cohort study 93%
- Validating the RISE UP score for predicting prognosis in patients with COVID-19 in the emergency department, a retrospective study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.