Multi-level multi-state modelling applied to hospital admission in mexican patients with COVID-19
Diaz-Martinez, J. P.; Orozco-Becerril, K. J.; Gallegos-Herrada, M. A.; Fuentes-Garcia, R.; Gutierrez-Garcia, M. A.; Espin-Garcia, O.
Show abstract
Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV 2 pandemic, healthcare authorities have made clear that it is crucial to track and identify COVID-19 symptoms and seek medical attention in the presence of the first warning signs, as immediate medical attention can improve the patients prognosis. Therefore the present work aims to analyze the risks associated with the time between the patients first symptoms and hospitalization followed by death. A cross-sectional study was performed among Mexican population diagnosed with COVID-19 and hospitalized from March to January 2021. Four different Bayesian models were developed to asses the risk associated with different patient trajectories: symptoms-hospitalization and hospitalization-death. Comorbidities that could worsen the patient outcome were included as linear predictions; these analyses were further broken down to the different states of the Mexican Republic and the healthcare providers within. Model III was chosen as the best performance through a validation of leaving one out (LOO). Increased risk for hospitalization was observed at the global population level for chronic renal disease, whereas for death such was the case for COPD and the interaction of diabetes:hypertension:obesity. Our results show that there are differences in mortality between the states without accounting for institution and it is related to the prompt time of death or viceversa. Regarding the 6 healthcare providers included in the analysis differences were also found. While state-managed hospitals and private sector showed lower risks, in contrast the IMSS seems to be the one with the highest risk. The proposed modelling can be helpful to improve healthcare assistance at a regional level, additionally it could inform statistical parameter inference in epidemiological models.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Nonspecific blood tests as proxies for COVID-19 hospitalization: are there plausible associations after excluding noisy predictors? 95%
- Covid-19 and excess mortality rates not comparable across countries 94%
- Analysis of the early Covid-19 epidemic curve in Germany by regression models with change points 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nowcasting and Forecasting the Spread of COVID-19 and Healthcare Demand In Turkey, A Modelling Study 94%
- Impact of Public Health Education Program on the Novel Coronavirus Outbreak in the United States 93%
- Adaptive time-dependent priors and Bayesian inference to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 public health measures validated on 31 countries 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comprehensive County Level Framework to Identify Factors Affecting Hospital Capacity and Predict Future Hospital Demand 94%
- Assessing the Impact of Human Mobility to Predict Regional Excess Death in Ecuador 94%
- Several countries in one: a mathematical modeling analysis for COVID-19 in inner Brazil 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.