Feasibility and utility of rapid antigen testing for COVID-19 in a university residence: a cross sectional study
Wong, S.; Romney, M. G.; Haase, K.; Matic, N.; Ranger, M.; Dhari, R.; AFfleck, F.; Tan, E.; Ndateba, I.; Tobias, E.; Saewyc, E.; Schwandt, M.; Sin, D.
Show abstract
ImportanceUnderstanding feasibility of rapid testing in congregate living setting provides critical data to reduce the risk of outbreaks in these settings. ObjectiveUse rapid antigen screening to detect SARS-CoV-2 in an asymptomatic group of university students and staff. DesignCross-sectional SettingUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. ParticipantsStudents and staff living or working in congregate housing. InterventionHealth care professional administered rapid antigen test Main Outcomes and measuresUse of BD Veritor rapid antigen testing and asymptomatic participants experiences with rapid testing ResultsA total of 3536 BD Veritor tests were completed in 1141 unique individuals. One third of participants completed between two to four tests and 21% were screened five or more times. The mean number of tests completed per person was three. The mean length of time between those who had more than one test was seven days. There were eight false positives and 25 PCR confirmed COVID-19 positive individuals identified through this work. All individuals reported having no symptoms that they attributed to COVID-19. Almost all (n=22, 88%) COVID-19 positive cases were found in male participants. A total of 86 additional students from multiple different student residences (n=9) were asked to self-isolate while they waited for their COVID-19 diagnostic test results. An average of seven additional students positive for COVID-19 living in congregate housing were identified through contact tracing by finding one positive case. Conclusions and relevanceRapid testing is a relatively inexpensive and operationally easy method of identifying asymptomatic individuals with COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Opinions of Former Jail Residents about Self-collection of SARS-CoV-2 Specimens, Paired with Wastewater Surveillance: A Qualitative Study Rapidly Examining Acceptability of COVID-19 Mitigation Measures 96%
- COVID-19 self-testing in Nigeria: Stakeholders’ opinions and perspective on its value for case detection 95%
- Sources of Successful Participant Engagement in a Public Health Research Study: a Focus on a Latino Community 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-tests for COVID-19: what is the evidence? A living systematic review and meta-analysis (2020-2023) 94%
- Diagnostic testing preferences can help inform future public health response efforts: global insights from an international survey 94%
- The development and validation of a survey to measure fecal-oral child exposure to zoonotic enteropathogens: The FECEZ Enteropathogens Index 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perceptions on undertaking regular asymptomatic self-testing for COVID-19 using lateral flow tests: A qualitative study of university students and staff 95%
- Cumulative incidence of SARS-CoV-2 and associated risk factors among healthcare workers in the Eastern Cape, South Africa 94%
- COVID-19 International Border Surveillance Cohort Study at Toronto’s Pearson Airport 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Lessons Learned From the Implementation of a Participant-Collected, Mail-Based SARS-CoV-2 Serological Survey in Massachusetts, USA 95%
- Engagement with daily testing instead of self-isolating in contacts of confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2 94%
- COVID-19 Prevention at Institutions of Higher Education, United States, 2020 – 2021: Implementation of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability, usability and performance of lateral flow immunoassay tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies: REACT-2 study of self-testing in non-healthcare key workers 93%
- Prevalence and factors associated with antigen test positivity following SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers in Los Angeles 93%
- When should healthcare workers with COVID-19 return to work? An analysis of follow-up antigen test results after a positive COVID test 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.