Back

ROS-Degradable Polythioketal Urethane Foam Dressings to Promote Porcine Skin Wound Repair

Patil, P.; Russo, K. A.; McCune, J. T.; Pollins, A. C.; Cottom, M. A.; Dollinger, B. R.; Colazo, J. M.; Yu, F.; Martin, J. R.; Gupta, M. K.; Cardwell, N. L.; Davidson, J. M.; Thompson, C. M.; Barbul, A.; Hasty, A. M.; Guelcher, S. A.; Duvall, C. L.

2021-05-23 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.05.21.445175 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Impaired skin healing and progression into chronic wounds is a prevalent and growing medical problem. Porous, resorbable biomaterials can be used as temporary substrates placed into skin defects to support cell infiltration, neo-tissue formation, and remodeling of nonhealing wounds. Naturally-derived biomaterials have promising healing benefits, but their low mechanical properties and exuberant costs limit their performance and use. Synthetic materials can be affordably manufactured and tuned across a broader range of physiochemical properties, but opportunities remain for tailoring them for ideal host immune and regenerative responses. Polyesters are the most clinically-tested class of synthetic biomaterials, but their hydrolysis releases acidic degradation products that can cause autocatalytic degradation processes that are poorly controlled and are not tied to cellular or other biologic activities. Here, we systemically explored a series of ROS-degradable polythioketal (PTK) urethane (UR) foams with varied hydrophilicity as an alternative class of synthetic biomaterials for wound healing. It was found that the most hydrophilic PTK- UR variant, which had 7 ethylene glycol (EG7) repeats flanking each side of each thioketal bond, had the highest ROS reactivity of the PTK-URs tested. In an in vivo porcine excisional skin wound healing model, hydrophilic EG7 PTK-UR foams more effectively promoted tissue integration, ECM deposition, and re- epithelialization of full-thickness skin wound compared to more hydrophobic PTK-UR variants. Resolution of type 1 inflammation and lower foreign body response to scaffold remnants was also observed for EG7 versus more hydrophobic PTK-UR scaffolds. Finally, porcine wound healing studies showed that EG7 PTK-UR foams had similar wound healing response to a collagen-based clinical gold standard product, Integra Bilayer Wound Matrix (BWM), while outperforming polyester UR foam-based NovoSorb Biodegradable Temporizing Matrix (BTM) with respect to increased ECM production, vascularization, and biomaterial-associated immune phenotype. In sum, PTK-UR foams warrant further development toward a new class of synthetic biomaterial foams for skin wound healing applications.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioactive Materials
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
4
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
8
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
9
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Advanced Materials
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
12
Biomaterials Advances
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
npj Regenerative Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.4%
15
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
17
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
18
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
19
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
Advanced Therapeutics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Advanced Materials Technologies
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
22
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
23
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
Biomacromolecules
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%