Back

Phylogenomic analysis of the genus Pseudomonas and reclassification of P. humi, P. zeshuii, P. psychrotolerans, P. nitritireducens, P. pharmacofabricae and P. panacis are later heterotypic synonym of P. citronellolis Lang 2007, P. luteola, P. oryzihabitans, P. nitroreducens Lang 2007, P. fluvialis and P. marginalis (Brown 1918) Stevens 1925 (Approved Lists 1980), respectively

Kujur, R. R.; Deb, S.; Das, S. K.

2021-05-19 microbiology
10.1101/2021.05.19.444773 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The present study described the comparative genomic analysis of the validly named species of the genus Pseudomonas to define the taxonomic assignment. Genomic information for 208 type strains was available in the NCBI genome database at the time of conducting this analysis. The ANI, AAI and in silico DNA DNA hybridization (isDDH) data were higher than the threshold values for the twelve strains with their closely related type species. Whole genome comparisons shared 97 - 99 % average nucleotide identity, 97.85 to 99.19 % average amino acid identity and 72.80 to 90.40 % digital DNA DNA hybridization values. Further, the phylogenomic analysis based on the core genome confirmed that P. humi CCA1 and P. citronellolis LMG 18378, P. zeshuii KACC 15471 and P. luteola NBRC 103146, P. oryzihabitans DSM 6835 and P. psychrotolerans DSM 15758, P. nitroreducens DSM 14399 and P. nitritireducens WZBFD3-5A2, P. fluvialis CCM 8778 and P. pharmacofabricae ZYSR67-Z, P. panacis DSM 18529 and P. marginalis DSM 13124 formed a monophyletic clade. Thus, we proposed six type species viz., P. humi CCA1, P. zeshuii KACC 15471, P. psychrotolerans DSM 15758, P. nitritireducens WZBFD3 5A2, P. pharmacofabricae ZYSR67 Z and P. panacis DSM 18529 are the later heterotypic synonym of P. citronellolis Lang 2007, P. luteola, P. oryzihabitans, P. nitroreducens Lang 2007, P. fluvialis and P. marginalis (Brown 1918) Stevens 1925 (Approved Lists 1980), respectively considering the priority date of publication.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.7%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.4%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
10.1%
4
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
5
Archives of Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Microbiology Resource Announcements
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Current Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
9
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
11
FEMS Microbiology Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
BMC Microbiology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
14
Microorganisms
101 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
16
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Environmental Microbiology Reports
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Microbial Pathogenesis
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
61 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
24
Microbial Ecology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
26
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%