Back

Locus Coeruleus Stimulation Affects response Adaptation in the Somatosensory Cortex of Whisker-to-barrel Touch System

Fazlali, Z.; Ranjbar-Slamloo, Y.

2021-05-21 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.05.19.444702 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stimulus-driven responses in the cortex reduce due to prior exposure to sensory stimuli, a phenomenon called sensory adaptation. Depression of synaptic supplies and afterhyperpolarization (AHP) following each action potential are the main proposed mechanisms for adaptation. In vitro studies have shown that the neuronal adaptation in the barrel cortex depends on slow AHPs. Such AHPs can be affected by neuromodulators, such as noradrenaline. This evidence suggests that Locus Coeruleus (LC) noradrenergic system may reduce sensory adaptation through this cellular mechanism. We proposed that LC stimulation before whisker deflection can affect the degree of adaptation in the barrel cortex, depending on the nature of noradrenergic interactions in the barrel cortex. We coupled adapted or non-adapted whisker deflections with LC phasic stimulation with a 400 ms interval. A 50ms sinusoidal vibration was applied to the whisker immediately before the test deflection. Neuronal activity was recorded from the barrel cortex (BC) in a urethane anesthetized rat. We quantified the effect of LC stimulation on the degree of adaptation in BC; a lower adaptation index shows lower adaptation. Our result showed that LC stimulation significantly modulated adapted response in 30 % of units with insignificant modulation on the adaptor or non-adapted response. This modulation was in two directions; adaptation decreased in 5 % of units and increased in 25 % of units. In addition to LC modulation on adaptor response in the level of individual units, adaptor response was lower modulated in around 70 % of units, on average. This modulation was not correlated by LC modulation on non-adapted response. Although sensory adaptation in BC was attenuate by LC stimulation in the majority of units, there was a limited number of units that showed significant modulation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 3%
12.7%
2
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Brain Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
9
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
79 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
12
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Neuroscience Letters
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
16
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
22
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Neuroscience Bulletin
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Journal of Comparative Physiology A
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
28
Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Neuropharmacology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%