Viability of MS2 and Phi6 Bacteriophages on Carpet and Dust
Nastasi, N.; Renninger, N.; Bope, A.; Cochran, S. J.; Greaves, J.; Haines, S. R.; Balasubrahmaniam, N.; Stuart, K.; Panescu, J.; Bibby, K.; Hull, N. M.; Dannemiller, K. C.
Show abstract
Respiratory viral illnesses are commonly spread in the indoor environment through multiple transmission routes, including droplets, aerosols, and direct/indirect contact. Indoors, resuspension of dust from flooring is a major source of human exposure. However, it is critical to determine viral persistence on dust and flooring to better characterize human exposure. The goal of this work is to determine viral viability on two carpet types (cut and looped) and house dust over time and after four different cleaning methods. MS2 and Phi6 bacteriophages were used to represent non-enveloped and enveloped viruses, respectively. These viral surrogates were placed in an artificial saliva solution and nebulized onto carpet or dust. Viability was measured at various time points (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 24, and 48 hours) and after cleaning (vacuuming, hot water extraction with stain remover, steam, and a disinfection spray). Viability decay was modeled as first-order. MS2 bacteriophages showed slower viability decay rates in dust (-0.11 hr-1), cut carpet (-0.20 hr-1), and looped carpet (-0.09 hr-1) compared to Phi6 (-3.36 hr-1, -1.57 hr-1, and - 0.20 hr-1 respectively). The difference between phages was statistically significant in dust and cut carpet (p<0.05). Viral RNA demonstrated minimal degradation that in most cases was not statistically different from zero over the 48 hours measured (p>0.05). Viable viral concentrations were reduced to below the detection limit for steam and disinfection for both MS2 and Phi6 (p<0.05), while vacuuming and hot water extraction with stain remover showed no significant changes in concentration from uncleaned carpet (p>0.05). This study used viral surrogates and did not model risk of viral transmission via dust. Overall, these results demonstrate that MS2 and Phi6 bacteriophages can remain viable in carpet and dust for several hours to days, and cleaning techniques with heat and disinfectants may be more effective than standard vacuuming for viral removal. Future work should model risk from exposure via dust and flooring for various viruses such as influenza, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=99 SRC="FIGDIR/small/444479v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (31K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1cc0ad9org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@dc440corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f787dcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f8bda3_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Rosin Soap Exhibits Virucidal Activity 93%
- Ancestral lineage of SARS-CoV-2 is more stable in human biological fluids than Alpha, Beta and Omicron variants of concern 93%
- Generation of false positive SARS-CoV-2 antigen results with testing conditions outside manufacturer recommendations: A scientific approach to pandemic misinformation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of High-Pressure Processing in Inactivation of the Hepatitis E Virus 95%
- COVID-19 Trends at The University of Tennessee: Predictive Insights from Raw Sewage SARS-CoV-2 Detection and Evaluation and PMMoV as an Indicator for Human Waste 94%
- Genomic modeling as an approach to identify surrogates for use in experimental validation of SARS-CoV-2 and HuNoVs inactivation by UV-C treatment 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Aerosolized Hydrogen Peroxide Decontamination of N95 Respirators, with Fit-Testing and Virologic Confirmation of Suitability for Re-Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic 96%
- Liquid chalk is an antiseptic against SARS-CoV-2 and influenza A respiratory viruses 94%
- Spatial and temporal variation in respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) subtype RNA in wastewater, and relation to clinical specimens 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.