Back

Syntrophy between fermentative and purple phototrophic bacteria for carbohydrate-based wastewater treatment

Cerruti, M.; Crosset-Perrotin, G.; Ananth, M.; Rombouts, J. L.; Weissbrodt, D. G.

2021-05-14 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.05.13.444055 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fermentative chemoorganoheterotrophic bacteria (FCB) and purple photoorganoheterotrophic bacteria (PPB) are two interesting microbial guilds to process carbohydrate-rich wastewaters. Their interaction has been studied in axenic pure cultures or co-cultures. Little is known about their metabolic interactions in open cultures. We aimed to harness the competitive and syntrophic interactions between PPB and FCB in mixed cultures. We studied the effect of reactor regimes (batch or continuous, CSTR) and illumination modes (continuous irradiation with infrared light, dark, or light/dark diel cycles) on glucose conversions and the ecology of the process. In batch, FCB outcompeted (>80%) PPB, under both dark and infrared light conditions. In CSTR, three FCB populations of Enterobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Clostridiaceae were enriched (>70%), while Rhodobacteraceae relatives of PPB made 30% of the community. Fermentation products generated from glucose were linked to the dominant FCB. Continuous culturing at a dilution rate of 0.04 h-1 helped maintain FCB and PPB in syntrophy: FCB first fermented glucose into volatile fatty acids and alcohols, and PPB grew on fermentation products. Direct supply of carboxylates like acetate under infrared light enriched for PPB (60%) independent of reactor regimes. Ecological engineering of FCB- and PPB-based biorefineries can help treat and valorize carbohydrate-based waste feedstocks. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=115 SRC="FIGDIR/small/444055v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (14K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1ee41forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@12d74aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@f46351org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a47706_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.8%
2
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
50% of probability mass above
3
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.5%
4
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
5
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
9
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
10
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
12
Bioresource Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
13
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
14
Environmental Research
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
15
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
16
Metabolic Engineering
68 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
17
PLOS Water
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.7%
19
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
20
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 78%
0.7%
21
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
Microbial Biotechnology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%