Back

Therapeutic Anticoagulation in Non-Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19

Lawler, P. R.; Goligher, E. C.; Berger, J. S.; Neal, M. D.; McVerry, B. J.; Nicolau, J. C.; Gong, M. N.; Carrier, M.; Rosenson, R. S.; Reynolds, H. R.; Turgeon, A. F.; Escobedo, J.; Huang, D. T.; Bradbury, C. A.; Houston, B. L.; Kornblith, L. Z.; Kumar, A.; Kahn, S. R.; Cushman, M.; McQuilten, Z.; Slutsky, A. S.; Kim, K. S.; Gordon, A. C.; Kirwan, B.-A.; Brooks, M. M.; Higgins, A. M.; Lewis, R. J.; Lorenzi, E.; Berry, S. M.; Berry, L. R.; Angus, D. C.; McArthur, C. J.; Webb, S. A.; Farkouh, M. E.; Hochman, J. S.; Zarychanski, R.

2021-05-17 intensive care and critical care medicine
10.1101/2021.05.13.21256846 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThrombo-inflammation may contribute to morbidity and mortality in Covid-19. We hypothesized that therapeutic-dose anticoagulation may improve outcomes in non-critically ill patients hospitalized for Covid-19. MethodsIn an open-label adaptive multiplatform randomized controlled trial, non-critically ill patients hospitalized for Covid-19, defined by the absence of critical care-level organ support at enrollment, were randomized to a pragmatic strategy of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin or usual care pharmacological thromboprophylaxis. The primary outcome combined survival to hospital discharge and days free of organ support through 21 days, which was evaluated with Bayesian statistical models according to baseline D-dimer. ResultsThe trial was stopped when prespecified criteria for superiority were met for therapeutic-dose anticoagulation in groups defined by high ([&ge;]2-fold elevated) and low (<2-fold elevated) D-dimer. Among 2219 participants in the final analysis, the probability that therapeutic anticoagulation increased organ support-free days compared to thromboprophylaxis was 99.0% (adjusted odds ratio 1.29, 95% credible interval 1.04 to 1.61). The adjusted absolute increase in survival to hospital discharge without organ support with therapeutic-dose anticoagulation was 4.6% (95% credible interval 0.7 to 8.1). In the primary adaptive stopping groups, the final probabilities of superiority for therapeutic anticoagulation were 97.3% in the high D-dimer group and 92.9% in the low D-dimer group. Major bleeding occurred in 1.9% and 0.9% of participants randomized to therapeutic anticoagulation and thromboprophylaxis, respectively. ConclusionsIn non-critically ill patients with Covid-19, an initial strategy of therapeutic-dose anticoagulation with heparin increases the probability of survival to hospital discharge with reduced use of organ support. Trial registration numbers: NCT02735707, NCT04505774, NCT04359277, NCT04372589

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.7%
2
Critical Care Explorations
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.3%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
5
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Trials
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
12
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
19
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
21
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
22
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
23
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
27
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
28
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
30
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%