Protein contact map prediction using multiple sequence alignment dropout and consistency learning for sequences with fewer homologs
Liu, X.; Jin, L.; Gao, S.; Zhao, S.
Show abstract
The prediction of protein contact map needs enough normalized number of effective sequence (Nf) in multiple sequence alignment (MSA). When Nf is small, the predicted contact maps are often not satisfactory. To solve this problem, we randomly selected a small part of sequence homologs for proteins with large Nf to generate MSAs with small Nf. From these MSAs, input features were generated and were passed through a consistency learning network, aiming to get the same results when using the features generated from the MSA with large Nf. The results showed that this method effectively improves the prediction accuracy of protein contact maps with small Nf.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved inter-protein contact prediction using dimensional hybrid residual networks and protein language models 98%
- Improved protein contact prediction using dimensional hybrid residual networks and singularity enhanced loss function 97%
- Accurate prediction of residue-residue contacts across homo-oligomeric protein interfaces through deep leaning 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- OPUS-X: An Open-Source Toolkit for Protein Torsion Angles, Secondary Structure, Solvent Accessibility, Contact Map Predictions, and 3D Folding 97%
- DeepUMQA: Ultrafast Shape Recognition-based Protein Model Quality Assessment using Deep Learning 97%
- Improving deep learning-based protein distance prediction in CASP14 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate prediction of protein torsion angles using evolutionary signatures and recurrent neural network 98%
- Deep Learning for Protein Peptide bindingPrediction: Incorporating Sequence, Structural andLanguage Model Features 96%
- A fully open-source framework for deep learning protein real-valued distances 96%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.