Back

Psychosis-like experiences and cognition in young adults: an observational and Mendelian randomisation study

Skirrow, C.; Suddell, S.; Mahedy, L.; Penton-Voak, I. S.; Munafo, M.; Wootton, R. E.

2021-05-10 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/2021.05.06.21256771 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPsychosis-like experiences (PLEs) are common and associated with mental health problems and poorer cognitive function. There is limited longitudinal research examining associations between cognition and PLEs in early adulthood. AimsWe investigated the association of PLEs with different domains of cognitive function, using cross-sectional and longitudinal observational, and Mendelian randomisation (MR) analyses. MethodParticipants from the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) completed tasks of working memory at age 18 and 24, and tasks of response inhibition and facial emotion recognition at age 24. Semi-structured interviews at age 18 and 24 established presence of PLEs (none vs. suspected/definite). Cross-sectional and prospective regression analysis tested associations between PLEs and cognition (N=3,087 imputed sample). MR examined causal pathways between schizophrenia liability and cognition. ResultsThe fully adjusted models indicated that PLEs were associated with poorer working memory performance (cross-sectional analyses: b=-0.18, 95% CI -0.27 to -0.08, p<0.001; prospective analyses: b=-0.18, 95% CI -0.31 to -0.06, p<0.01). A similar pattern of results was found for PLEs and response inhibition (cross-sectional analyses: b=7.29, 95% CI 0.96 to 13.62, p=0.02; prospective analyses: b=10.29, 95% CI 1.78 to 18.97, p=0.02). We did not find evidence to suggest an association between PLEs and facial emotion recognition. MR analyses were underpowered and did not support observational results. ConclusionsIn young adults, PLEs are associated with poorer concurrent and future working memory and response inhibition. Better powered genetically informed studies are needed to determine if these associations are causal.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.9%
2
Schizophrenia Bulletin
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.5%
3
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
5
JAMA Psychiatry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
6
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
7
Neuropsychopharmacology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
8
Schizophrenia
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.9%
10
Biological Psychiatry
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
16
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
18
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
American Journal of Psychiatry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
22
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
24
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%