Symbiont-conferred immunity interacts with the effects of parasitoid genotype and intraguild predation to shape pea aphid immunity in a clone-specific fashion
Purkiss, S. A.; Khudr, M. S.; Aguinaga, O. E.; Hager, R.
Show abstract
Host-parasite interactions represent complex co-evolving systems in which genetic variation within a species can significantly affect selective pressure on traits in the other (for example via inter-species indirect genetic effects). While often viewed as a two-species interaction between host and parasite species, some systems are more complex due to the involvement of symbionts in the host that influence its immunity, enemies of the host, and the parasite through intraguild predation. However, it remains unclear what the joint effects of intraguild predation, defensive endosymbiosis, within-species genetic variation and indirect genetic effects on host immunity are. We have addressed this question in an important agricultural pest system, the pea aphid Acyrthosiphon pisum, which shows significant intraspecific variability in immunity to the parasitoid wasp Aphidius ervi due to immunity conferring endosymbiotic bacteria. In a complex experiment involving a quantitative genetic design of the parasitoid, two ecologically different aphid lineages and the aphid lion Chrysoperla carnea as an intraguild predator, we demonstrate that aphid immunity is affected by intraspecific genetic variation in the parasitoid and the aphid, as well as by associated differences in the defensive endosymbiont communities. Using 16s rRNA sequencing, we identified secondary symbionts that differed between the lineages. We further show that aphid lineages differ in their altruistic behaviour once parasitised whereby infested aphids move away from the clonal colony to facilitate predation. The outcome of these complex between-species interactions not only shape important host-parasite systems but have also implications for understanding the evolution of multitrophic interactions, and aphid biocontrol.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Local adaptation to hosts and parasitoids shape Hamiltonella defensa genotypes across aphid species 98%
- Multidimensional plasticity in the Glanville fritillary butterfly: larval performance curves are temperature, host and family specific. 93%
- Varying phylogenetic signal in susceptibility to four bacterial pathogens across species of Drosophilidae 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic diversity in vector populations influences the transmission efficiency of an important plant virus 95%
- Heliconiini butterflies can learn time-dependent reward associations 91%
- Systemic orchestration of cell size throughout the body: Influence of sex and rapamycin exposure in Drosophila melanogaster 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Grain aphids (Sitobion avenae) with knockdown resistance (kdr) to insecticide exhibit fitness trade-offs, including increased vulnerability to the natural enemy Aphidius ervi. 93%
- BIN overlap confirms transcontinental distribution of pest aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) 93%
- Learning can be detrimental for a parasitic wasp 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex makes them sleepy: change in host reproductive status induces diapause in parasitoids 94%
- Parasitic success and venom composition evolve upon specialization of parasitoid wasps to different host species 93%
- Dopamine pathway characterization during the reproductive mode switch in the pea aphid 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Intraspecific variation in symbiont density in an insect-microbe symbiosis 93%
- Sequence-based genome-wide association studies reveal the polygenic architecture of Varroa destructor resistance in Western honey bees Apis mellifera 91%
- Mosquito-bacteria interactions during larval development trigger metabolic changes with carry-over effects on adult fitness 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.