Back

The interplay of spatial scale and landscape transformation moderates the abundance and intraspecific variation in the ecomorphological traits of a phyllostomid bat

Ramirez-Mejia, A. F.; Urbina-Cardona, N.; Sanchez, F.

2021-05-02 ecology
10.1101/2021.05.01.442263 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Land-use intensification imposes selective pressures that systematically change the frequency of wild population phenotypes. Growing evidence is biased towards the comparison of populations from discrete categories of land uses, ignoring the role of landscape emerging properties on the phenotype selection of wild fauna. Across the largest urban-rural gradient of the Colombian Orinoquia, we measured ecomorphological traits of 216 individuals of the Flat-faced Fruit-eating Bat Artibeus planirostris, to evaluate the scale of effect at which landscape transformation better predicts changes in phenotype and abundance of an urban-tolerant species. Forest percentage at 1.25 km was the main predictor affecting abundance, wing aspect ratio, and body mass of this phyllostomid; but the direction of the effect differed between abundance and ecomorphological traits. Although landscape factors explained changes in the forearm length at all spatial scales, the effect was sex-dependent and the most important predictor was forest percentage at 0.5 km. Our results indicate that landscape elements and spatial scale interact to shape ecomorphological traits and the abundance of A. planirostris. Interestingly, the scale of effect was congruent among all biological responses. A pattern that likely arises since species abundance can reflect the variation on phenotype under different environmental filters across landscape scenarios.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
2
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.1%
3
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.1%
4
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
6
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.3%
8
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
9
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
10
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
13
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
17
Diversity and Distributions
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 65%
1.1%
19
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
22
Ibis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
23
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
24
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
25
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
26
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
27
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
28
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
29
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
30
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%