Back

Stability of microbiota in vineyard soils across consecutive years.

Cestaro, A.; coller, e.; Albanese, D.; stefani, e.; Pindo, M.; ioriatti, c.; Zanzotti, R.; Donai, C.

2021-04-30 microbiology
10.1101/2021.04.29.442071 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Agricultural soils harbor rich and diverse microbial communities that have a deep influence on soil properties and productivity. Large scale studies have shown the impact of environmental parameters like climate or chemical composition on the distribution of bacterial and fungal species. Comparatively, little data exists documenting how soil microbial communities change between different years. Quantifying the temporal stability of soil microbial communities will allow us to better understand the relevance of the differences between environments and their impact on ecological processes on the global and local scale. We characterized the bacterial and fungal components of the soil microbiota in ten vineyards in two consecutive years. Despite differences of species richness and diversity between the two years, we found a general stability of the taxonomic structure of the soil microbiota. Temporal differences were smaller than differences due to geographical location, vineyard land management or differences between sampling sites within the same vineyard. Using machine learning, we demonstrated that each site was characterized by a distinctive microbiota, and we identified a reduced set of indicator species that could classify samples according to their geographic origin across different years with high accuracy. ImportanceThe temporal stability of the soil microbiota is important to understand the relevance of the differences that are found in response to a variety of environmental factors. By comparing fungal and bacterial microbiota from samples collected in the same sites in two consecutive years, we found a remarkable stability of both components, with characteristic differences between bacteria and fungi. Our work fills an important gap toward the definition of a microbial cartography of agricultural soils.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Environmental Microbiome
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.5%
3
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
9.5%
4
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.5%
5
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
8
Microbial Ecology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
10
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
11
Microorganisms
106 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.1%
12
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
13
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.1%
15
FEMS Microbes
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.1%
18
Phytobiomes Journal
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
21
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
22
Archives of Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
MicrobiologyOpen
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 58%
0.8%
25
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%