Professionals' views on the mental health problems and vulnerability of children and young people during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic
Edbrooke-Childs, J.; Labno, A.; Cortina, M. A.; Gilleard, A.; Hayes, D.; Yoon, Y.; Dalton-Locke, C.; Johnson, S.; Simpson, A.; Vera San Juan, N.; Brooks-Hall, E.; Mental Health Policy Research Unit,
Show abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic caused major disruptions to everyday life for children and young people. The aim of this study was to examine professionals views on the mental health problems and vulnerabilities of children and young people during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted a secondary analysis of an online survey completed by mental health professionals in the UK between 22 April 2020 and 12 May 2020. The final sample was N = 601 professionals who at least partly worked with children and young people. Quantitative and qualitative survey data showed that professionals were concerned about young people experiencing economic disadvantage and young people from minority ethnic groups, as pre-existing social inequalities resulted in increased risk of infection and reduced access to physical and mental health care. Professionals were concerned about young people with little family support and young people at risk of relapse or deterioration in mental health, reporting the exacerbation of pre-existing mental health difficulties and challenging behaviours. Further research, involving young people as researchers, is needed to explore the continued impact for children and young people, and their families, including in comparison to their experiences before the pandemic.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 96%
- Service user experiences of community services for Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic synthesis 96%
- Exploring the experiences of loneliness in adults with mental health problems: a co-produced participatory qualitative interview study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Priorities for Future Research about Screen Use and Adolescent Mental Health: A Participatory Prioritization Study 96%
- Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions 96%
- Recovery from severe mental health problems: A systematic review of service user and informal caregiver perspectives 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 97%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 96%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 96%
- One year later: Tracking the continued growth of mental illness stigma in England 93%
- The mental health of NHS staff during the COVID-19 pandemic: a two-wave cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- What has changed in the experiences of people with mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic? Findings from follow-up interviews using a coproduced, participatory qualitative approach 96%
- Impact on mental health care and on mental health service users of the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed methods survey of UK mental health care staff 93%
- Mental health in higher-education students and non-students: evidence from a nationally representative panel study 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.