Back

Surveillance of potential pathogens and antibiotic resistance in wastewater and surface water from Boston, USA and Vellore, India using long-read metagenomic sequencing

Fuhrmeister, E. R.; Voth-Gaeddert, L. E.; Metilda, A.; Tai, A.; Batorsky, R. E.; Veeraraghavan, B.; Ward, H.; Kang, G.; Pickering, A.

2021-04-26 public and global health
10.1101/2021.04.22.21255864 medRxiv
Show abstract

Environmental sampling (wastewater) could be an efficient surveillance strategy to capture global emerging trends in the spread of antibiotic resistance. Long-read DNA sequencing can resolve the genetic context of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) and is a promising tool for non-culture-based monitoring of antibiotic-resistant pathogens and ARGs in environmental samples, but has not been rigorously validated against conventional methods. We tested long-read sequencing using the portable Nanopore MinION for surveying pathogens, ARGs, and antibiotic-resistant pathogens in municipal wastewater, hospital wastewater, and surface water collected from Boston, USA and Vellore, India. We compared detection of enteric pathogens by assembly of long reads, with and without short-read polishing, and unassembled raw long reads for ARGs to multiplex real-time PCR. Using real-time PCR as a benchmark, long-read metagenomics was 49% sensitive and 75% specific at pathogen detection in assembled contigs, and 16% sensitive and 100% specific at detecting 28 clinically relevant resistance genes in raw long reads. Short-read polishing did not substantially improve pathogen identification or impact ARG identification in the assembled contigs, demonstrating that short-read polishing is not required, which greatly reduces costs. The high specificity of ARG detection supports portable long-read sequencing as a valuable tool to profile ARGs and antibiotic-resistant pathogens for environmental surveillance programs.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.