When can we safely return to normal? A novel method for identifying safe levels of NPIs in the context of COVID-19 vaccinations
Bianchin, G.; Dall'Anese, E.; Poveda, J. I.; Buchwald, A.
Show abstract
Over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, governing bodies and individuals have relied on a variety of non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) to control the transmission of SARS-CoV-2, which posed an acute threat to individuals well-being and consistently impacted economic activities in many countries worldwide. NPIs have been implemented at varying levels of severity and in response to widely-divergent perspectives of risk tolerance. Now, concurrently with the introduction of multiple SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, the world looks optimistically to a "return to normality". In this work, we propose a multi-disciplinary approach, combining transmission modeling with control and optimization theory, to examine how risk tolerance and vaccination rates will impact the safe return to normal behavior over the next few months. To this end, we consider a version of the Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered transmission model that accounts for hospitalizations, vaccinations, and loss of immunity. We then propose a novel control approach to calibrate the necessary level of NPIs at various geographical levels to guarantee that the number of hospitalizations does not exceed a given risk tolerance (i.e., a maximum allowable threshold). Our model and control objectives are calibrated and tailored for the state of Colorado, USA. Our results suggest that: (i) increasing risk tolerance can decrease the number of days required to discontinue all NPIs; (ii) increasing risk tolerance inherently increases COVID-19 deaths even in the context of vaccination; (iii) if the vaccination uptake in the population is 70% or less, then return to normal behavior within the next year may newly stress the healthcare system. Furthermore, by using a multi-region model accounting for travel, our simulations predict that: (iv) relaxation should take into account regional heterogeneity in transmission and travel; and (v) premature relaxation of NPIs, even if restricted only to low-density regions, will lead to exceeding hospitalization limits even when highly-populated regions implement full-closures. Although the simulations are performed for the state of Colorado, the proposed model of transmission and control methods are applicable to any area worldwide and can be utilized at any geographical granularity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Covid-19 spreading and optimal coordination of counter-measures: From microscopic to macroscopic models to Pareto fronts 97%
- Dynamical SPQEIR model assesses the effectiveness of non-pharmaceutical interventions against COVID-19 epidemic outbreaks 97%
- Reopening California : Seeking Robust, Non-Dominated COVID-19 Exit Strategies 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel travel time aware metapopulation models and multi-layer waning immunity for late-phase epidemic and endemic scenarios 98%
- Appropriate relaxation of non-pharmaceutical interventions minimizes the risk of a resurgence in SARS-CoV-2 infections in spite of the Delta variant 97%
- Age-structured non-pharmaceutical interventions for optimal control of COVID-19 epidemic 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of COVID-19 variant importation – How useful are travel control measures? 97%
- A Metapopulation Network Model for the Spreading of SARS-CoV-2: Case Study for Ireland 97%
- The relationship between controllability, optimal testing resource allocation, and incubation-latent period mismatch as revealed by COVID-19 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimizing the Timing and Composition of Therapeutic Phage Cocktails: A Control-theoretic Approach 97%
- Convex representation of metabolic networks with Michaelis-Menten kinetics 96%
- Modeling and Global Sensitivity Analysis of Strategies to Mitigate Covid-19 Transmission on a Structured College Campus 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.