Back

Comparative analysis of molecular representations in prediction of drug combination effects

Zagidullin, B.; Wang, Z.; Guan, Y.; Pitkänen, E.; Tang, J.

2021-06-04 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.04.16.439299 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWApplication of machine and deep learning methods in drug discovery and cancer research has gained a considerable amount of attention in the past years. As the field grows, it becomes crucial to systematically evaluate the performance of novel computational solutions in relation to established techniques. To this end we compare rule-based and data-driven molecular representations in prediction of drug combination sensitivity and drug synergy scores using standardized results of 14 throughput screening studies, comprising 64 200 unique combinations of 4 153 molecules tested in 112 cancer cell lines. We evaluate the clustering performance of molecular representations and quantify their similarity by adapting the Centered Kernel Alignment metric. Our work demonstrates that to identify an optimal molecular representation type it is necessary to supplement quantitative benchmark results with qualitative considerations, such as model interpretability and robustness, which may vary between and throughout preclinical drug development projects. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=168 SRC="FIGDIR/small/439299v2_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (41K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bc4509org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1586640org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a11129org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6dc93b_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.