Back

A computational model of typical and impaired reading: the role of visual processing

Chang, Y.-N.; Welbourne, S.; Furber, S.; Lambon Ralph, M. A.

2021-04-15 neuroscience
10.1101/2021.04.15.440047 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Computational modelling has served as a powerful tool to advance our understanding of language processes by making theoretical ideas rigorously specified and testable (a form of " open science" for theory building). In reading research, one of the most influential computational modelling frameworks is the triangle model of reading that characterises the mappings between orthography, phonology and semantics. Currently, most instantiations of the triangle modelling framework start the processes from orthographic levels which abstract away visual processing. Moreover, without visual processing, most models do not provide an opportunity to investigate visual-related dyslexia. To bridge this crucial gap, the present study extended the existing triangle models by implementing an additional visual input. We trained the model to learn to read from visual input without pre-defined orthographic representations. The model was assessed by reading tasks in both intact and after damage (to mimic acquire alexias). The simulation results demonstrated that the model was able to name word and nonwords as well as make lexical decisions. Damage to the visual, phonological or semantic components of the model resulted in the expected reading impairments associated with pure alexia, phonological dyslexia, and surface dyslexia, respectively. The simulation results demonstrated for the first time that both typical and neurologically-impaired reading including both central and peripheral dyslexia could be addressed in this extended triangle model of reading. The findings are consistent with the primary systems account.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.6%
2
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
7
Neurobiology of Language
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
8
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
9
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
13
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
15
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
19
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.6%
28
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
29
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%