Making Words Count with Computerised Identification of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Patients
Slater, L. T.; Bradlow, W.; Desai, T.; Aziz, A.; Evison, F.; Ball, S.; Gkoutos, G. V.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe traditional outpatient model in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is under pressure. Population health management based on an accurate patient record provides an efficient, cost-effective alternative. MethodsTo improve the accuracy of the HCM patient list in a single hospital, we developed a rule-based information extraction natural language processing (NLP) framework. The framework employed ontological expansion of vocabulary and exclusion-first annotation, and received training by an expert in the loop. The output stratified patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), those without active cardiology care and likely screened individuals. ResultsThe algorithm was validated against multiple data sources, including manual validation, for HCM, AF and HF and family history of the disease. Overall precision and recall were 0.854 and 0.865 respectively. The pipeline found 25,356 documents featuring HCM-related terms belonging to 11,083 patients. Excluding scanned documents resulted in 17,178 letters from 3,120 patients. Subsequent categorisation identified 1,753 real cases, of whom 357 had AF and 205 had HF. There were 696 likely screened individuals. Adjusting for 304 false-negative patients, the total HCM cohort was 2,045 patients. 214 were not under a cardiologist. NLP uncovered 709 patients who were absent in the registry or hospital disease codes. ConclusionThis novel NLP framework generated a hospital-wide record of patients with HCM and defined various cohorts, including the small set of HCM patients lacking current cardiology input. Existing data sources inadequately described this population, spotlighting NLPs essential role for clinical teams planning to move to a population health management model of care.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Comparative Analysis of Privacy-Preserving Large Language Models For Automated Echocardiography Report Analysis 96%
- Development and Validation of Phenotype Classifiers across Multiple Sites in the Observational Health Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) Network 94%
- Biometric Contrastive Learning for Data-Efficient Deep Learning from Electrocardiographic Images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- GenECG: A synthetic image-based ECG dataset to augment artificial intelligence-enhanced algorithm development 93%
- Natural Language Word-Embeddings as a glimpse into healthcare at the End Of Life 92%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiology Services 92%
- Multispecialty multidisciplinary input into comorbidities in heart failure reduces hospitalisation and clinic attendance 91%
- Impact of COVID-19 on recorded blood pressure screening and hypertension management in England: An analysis of monthly changes in Quality and Outcomes Framework indicators in OpenSAFELY 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.