The impact of technology systems and professional support in digital mental health interventions: a secondary meta-analysis
Sasseville, M.; LeBlanc, A.; Tchuente, J.; Boucher, M.; Dugas, M.; Mbemba, G.; Barony, R.; Chouinard, M.-C.; Beaulieu, M.; Beaudet, N.; Skidmore, B.; Cholette, P.; Aspiros, C.; Larouche, A.; Chabot, G.; Gagnon, M.-P.
Show abstract
BackgroundA rapid review of systematic reviews was conducted to assess the effectiveness of digital mental health interventions for people with a chronic disease. Although it provided an overview of the evidence, it offered limited understanding of ethe types of interventions that were the most effective. The aim of this study was to perform a meta-analysis of primary studies identified in this rapid review of systematic reviews by focusing on the needs of knowledge users. MethodsThis secondary meta-analysis follows a rapid review of systematic reviews, a virtual workshop with knowledge users to identify research questions and a modified Delphi study to guide research methods. We conducted a secondary analysis of the primary studies identified in the rapid review. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts and applied inclusion criteria: RCT design using a digital mental health intervention in a population of adults with another chronic condition, published after 2010 in French or English, and including an outcome measurement of anxiety or depression. Results708 primary studies were extracted from the systematic reviews and 84 primary studies met the inclusion criteria Digital mental health interventions were significantly more effective than in-person care for both anxiety and depression outcomes. Online messaging was the most effective technology to improve anxiety and depression scores; however, all technology types were effective. Interventions partially supported by healthcare professionals were more effective than self-administered. ConclusionsWhile our meta-analysis identifies digital interventions characteristics that are more effective, all technologies and levels of support can be used considering implementation context and population. Review registrationThe protocol for this review is registered in the National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (NCCMT) COVID-19 Rapid Evidence Service (ID 75).
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Remote working in mental health services: a rapid umbrella review of pre-COVID-19 literature 96%
- Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Chatbots in Promoting Health Behavioral Changes: A Systematic Review 95%
- Are digital technology interventions effective to reduce loneliness in older adults? A systematic review and meta-analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
- Suitability of just-in-time adaptive intervention in post-COVID-19-related symptoms: A systematic scoping review 94%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding the Impact of Digital Technology on the Well-being of Older Immigrants and Refugees: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- Digitally managing depression: a fully remote randomized attention-placebo controlled trial 92%
- A digital self-care intervention for Ugandan patients with heart failure and their clinicians: User-centred design and usability study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 94%
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 94%
- A Scoping Review Protocol on Integration of mobile-linked POC diagnostics in community-based healthcare: User Experience 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Scalability of mobile technology interventions in the prevention and management of HIV among adolescents in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a systematic review 95%
- Common Practices for Sociodemographic Data Reporting in Digital Mental Health Intervention Research: A Scoping Review 95%
- Face-to-face interventions to encourage enrolment in cardiac rehabilitation; a scoping review protocol 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.