Back

Evaluation of County-Level Heterogeneity in Excess Mortality in Colorado from March to September 2020

Chandra, J.; Charpignon, M.; Samuel, M. C.; Bhaskar, A.; Sundar, S.; Bol, K.; Lai, Y.; Celi, L. A.; Sgaier, S. K.; Charles, G.; Majumder, M. S.

2021-04-17 public and global health
10.1101/2021.04.10.21255235 medRxiv
Show abstract

1.ImportanceTracking the direct and indirect impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on all-cause mortality in the United States has been hindered by the lack of testing and by reporting delays. Evaluating excess mortality, or the number of deaths above what is expected in a given time period, provides critical insights into the true burden of the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the novel Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Stratifying mortality data by demographics such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, and geography helps quantify how subgroups of the population have been differentially affected. Similarly, stratifying mortality data by cause of death reveals the public health effects of the pandemic in terms of other acute and chronic diseases. ObjectiveTo provide stratified estimates of excess mortality in Colorado from March to September 2020. Design, Setting, and PopulationThis study evaluated the number of excess deaths both directly due to SARS-CoV-2 infection and from all other causes between March and September 2020 at the county level in Colorado. Data were obtained from the Vital Statistics Program at the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. These estimates of excess mortality were derived by comparing population-adjusted mortality rates in 2020 with rates in the same months from 2015 to 2019. ResultsWe found evidence of excess mortality in Colorado between March and September 2020. Two peaks in excess deaths from all causes were recorded in the state, one mid-April and the other at the end of June. Since the first documented SARS-CoV-2 infection on March 5th, we estimated that the excess mortality rate in Colorado was two times higher than the officially reported COVID-19 mortality rate. State-level cumulative excess mortality from all causes reached 71 excess deaths per 100k residents ([~]4000 excess deaths in the state); in contrast, 35 deaths per 100k directly due to SARS-CoV-2 were recorded in the same period ([~]1980 deaths. Excess mortality occurred in 52 of 64 counties, accounting for 99% of the states population. Most excess deaths recorded from March to September 2020 were associated with acute events (estimated at 44 excess deaths per 100k residents and at 9 after excluding deaths directly due to SARS-CoV-2) rather than with chronic conditions ([~]21 excess deaths per 100k). Among Coloradans aged 14-44, 1.4 times more deaths occurred in those months than during the same period in the five previous years. Hispanic White males died of COVID-19 at the highest rate during this time ([~]90 deaths from COVID-19 per 100k residents); however, Non-Hispanic Black/African American males were the most affected in terms of overall excess mortality ([~]204 excess deaths per 100k). Beyond inequalities in COVID-19 mortality per se, these findings signal considerable regional and racial-ethnic disparities in excess all-cause mortality that need to be addressed for a just recovery and in future public health crises.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.7%
2
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
16.7%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.8%
4
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
6
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
7
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
8
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.9%
9
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.9%
10
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
13
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
14
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
16
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
18
The Lancet Regional Health - Americas
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Global Health
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
22
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
27
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
28
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
29
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.7%