Early Experience With Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibody Therapy For COVID-19
Jarrett, M. P.; Licht, W. B.; Bock, K.; Brown, Z.; Hirsch, J. S.; Coppa, K.; Brar, R.; Bello, S.; Nash, I. S.
Show abstract
ImportanceNeutralizing monoclonal antibody (MAB) therapies may benefit patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 at high risk for progressing to severe COVID-19 and/or hospitalization. Studies documenting approaches to deliver MAB infusions as well as demonstrating their efficacy are lacking. ObjectiveWe describe our experience and patient outcomes of almost 3,000 patients who received MAB infusion therapy at Northwell Health, a large integrated health care system in New York. Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis is a descriptive study of adult patients who received MAB therapy between November 20, 2020, to January 31, 2021, and a retrospective cohort survival analysis comparing patients who received MAB therapy prior to admission versus those who did not. A multivariable Cox model with inverse probability weighting according to the propensity score including covariates (sociodemographic, comorbidities, and presenting vital signs) was used. Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; additional evaluations included ED utilization and hospitalization within 28 days of a positive COVID-19 test for patients who received MAB therapy. ResultsDuring the study period, 2818 adult patients received MAB infusion. Following therapy and within 28 days of COVID-19 test, 123 patients (4.4%) presented to the ED and were released and 145 patients (5.1%) were hospitalized. These 145 patients were compared with 200 controls who were eligible for but did not receive MAB therapy, and were hospitalized. In the MAB group, 16 (11%) patients met the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality, versus 21 (10.5%) in the control group. In an unadjusted Cox model, the hazard ratio (HR) for time to in-hospital mortality for the MAB group was 1.38 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.696-2.719). Models adjusting for demographics (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.53-2.23), demographics and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.573-2.59), and with inverse probability weighting according to propensity scores (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.619-2.29) did not demonstrate significance. The hospitalization rate was 4.4% for patients who received MAB therapy within 0-4 days, 5% within 5-7 days, and 6.1% within [≥]8 days of symptom onset (p-value = 0.15). Conclusions and relevanceEstablishing the capability to provide neutralizing MAB infusion therapy requires significant planning and coordination. While this therapy may be an important treatment option for early mild to moderate COVID-19 in high-risk patients, further investigations are needed to define the optimal timing of MAB treatment in order to reduce hospitalization and mortality.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of monoclonal antibody treatment on hospitalization and mortality among non-hospitalized adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection 97%
- Sex and gender differences in COVID testing, hospital admission, presentation, and drivers of severe outcomes in the DC/Maryland region 93%
- Safety and Efficacy of Dupilumab for the Treatment of Hospitalized Patients with Moderate to Severe COVID 19: A Phase IIa Trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of casirivimab and imdevimab, and sotrovimab during Delta variant surge: a prospective cohort study and comparative effectiveness randomized trial 96%
- Children with SARS-CoV-2 in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) 91%
- Out-of-Pocket Spending for COVID-19 Hospitalizations in 2020 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes for 7,995 Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection 94%
- Early but not late convalescent plasma is associated with better survival in moderate-to-severe COVID-19 93%
- Safety and effectiveness of RBD-specific polyclonal equine F(ab′)2 fragments for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe Covid-19 disease: a retrospective cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical Trends Among U.S. Adults Hospitalized with COVID-19, March-December 2020 93%
- Effectiveness of COVID-19 treatment with nirmatrelvir-ritonavir or molnupiravir among U.S. Veterans: target trial emulation studies with one-month and six-month outcomes 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antibody response and breakthrough infection in dialysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Multi-center, Prospective, Observational-cohort controlled study of Clinical Outcomes following COVID-19 Convalescent plasma therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients 94%
- Compassionate Use of REGEN-COV ® in Patients with COVID-19 and Immunodeficiency-Associated Antibody Disorders 93%
- SARS-CoV-2 RNAaemia predicts clinical deterioration and extrapulmonary complications from COVID-19 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.