Post-acute COVID-19 sequelae in cases managed in the community or hospital in the UK: a population based study
Whittaker, H. R.; Gulea, C.; Koteci, A.; Kallis, C.; Morgan, A. D.; Iwundu, C.; Weeks, M.; Gupta, R.; Quint, J. K.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo compare post-COVID-19 sequelae between hospitalised and non-hospitalised individuals DesignPopulation-based cohort study Setting1,383 general practices in England contributing to Clinical Practice Research Database Aurum Participants46,687 COVID-19 cases diagnosed between 1st August to 17th October 2020 (45.4% male; mean age 40), either hospitalised within two weeks of diagnosis or non-hospitalised, and followed-up for a maximum of three months. Main outcome measuresEvent rates of new symptoms, diseases, prescriptions and healthcare utilisation in hospitalised and non-hospitalised individuals, with between-group comparison using Cox regression. Outcomes compared at 6 and 12 months prior to index date, equating to first UK wave and pre-pandemic. Non-hospitalised group outcomes stratified by age and sex. Results45,272 of 46,687 people were non-hospitalised; 1,415 hospitalised. Hospitalised patients had higher rates of 13/26 symptoms and 11/19 diseases post-COVID-19 than the community group, received more prescriptions and utilised more healthcare. The largest differences were noted for rates per 100,000 person-weeks [95%CI] of breathlessness: 536 [432 to 663] v. 85 [77 to 93]; joint pain: 295 [221 to 392] v. 168 [158 to 179]; diabetes: 303 [225 to 416] v. 36 [32 to 42], hypertension: 244 [178 to 344] v. 47 [41 to 53]. Although low, rates of chest tightness, tinnitus and lung fibrosis were higher in the community group. 4.2% (1882/45,272) of the community group had a post-acute burden, most frequently reporting anxiety, breathlessness, chest pain and fatigue. In those non-hospitalised, age and sex differences existed in outcome rates. Healthcare utilisation in the community group increased 28.5% post-COVID-19 relative to pre-pandemic. ConclusionsPost-COVID-19 sequelae differ between hospitalised and non-hospitalised individuals, with age and sex-specific differences in those non-hospitalised. Most COVID-19 cases managed in the community do not report ongoing issues to healthcare professionals. Post-COVID-19 follow-up and management strategies need to be tailored to specific groups.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of adverse outcome in patients with suspected COVID-19 managed in a ‘virtual hospital’ setting: a cohort study 96%
- The risk of COVID hospital admission and COVID mortality during the first COVID 19 wave with a special emphasis on Ethnic Minorities: an observational study of a single, deprived, multi ethnic UK health economy 94%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Post-COVID assessment in a specialist clinical service: a 12-month, single-centre analysis of symptoms and healthcare needs in 1325 individuals 97%
- Clinical characteristics and outcomes of adult patients admitted with COVID-19 in East London: a retrospective cohort analysis 95%
- Patient symptoms and experience following COVID-19: results from a UK wide survey 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient outcomes after hospitalisation with COVID-19 and implications for follow-up; results from a prospective UK cohort. 94%
- Early Lenzilumab Treatment Of COVID-19 Patients Using C-Reactive Protein As A Biomarker Improves Efficacy: Results From The Phase 3 ‘Live-Air’ Trial 90%
- Drive-through testing for SARS-CoV-2 in symptomatic health and social care workers and household members: an observational cohort study in Tayside, Scotland 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics of Long Covid: findings from a social media survey 95%
- Burden of Post-COVID-19 Syndrome and Implications for Healthcare Service Planning: A Population-based Cohort Study 94%
- LMIC-PRIEST: Derivation and validation of a clinical severity score for acutely ill adults with suspected COVID-19 in a middle-income setting 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Colchicine for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial 93%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 92%
- Targeted encouragement of GP consultations for possible cancer symptoms: randomised controlled trial 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.