Back

North West London Covid-19 Vaccination Programme: Real-world evidence for Vaccine uptake and effectiveness.

Glampson, B.; Brittain, J.; Kaura, A.; Mulla, A.; Mercuri, L.; Brett, S.; Aylin, P.; Sandall, T.; Goodman, I.; Redhead, J.; Saravanakumar, K.; Mayer, E.

2021-04-10 health informatics
10.1101/2021.04.08.21254580 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the early vaccine administration coverage and vaccine effectiveness and outcome data across an integrated care system of eight CCGs leveraging a unique population-level care dataset DesignRetrospective cohort study. SettingIndividuals eligible for COVID 19 vaccination in North West London based on linked primary and secondary care data. Participants2,183,939 individuals eligible for COVID 19 vaccination ResultsDuring the NWL vaccine programme study time period 5.88% of individuals declined and did not receive a vaccination. Black or black British individuals had the highest rate of declining a vaccine at 16.14% (4,337). There was a strong negative association between deprivation and rate of declining vaccination (r=-0.94, p<0.01) with 13.5% of individuals declining vaccination in the most deprived postcodes compared to 0.98% in the least deprived postcodes. In the first six days after vaccination 344 of 389587 individuals tested positive for COVID-19 (0.09%). The rate increased to 0.13% (525/389,243) between days 7 and 13, before then gradually falling week on week. At 28 days post vaccination there was a 74% (HR 0.26 (0.19-0.35)) and 78% (HR 0.22 (0.18-0.27)) reduction in risk of testing positive for COVID-19 for individuals that received the Oxford/Astrazeneca and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines respectively, when compared with unvaccinated individuals. After vaccination very low rates of hospital admission were seen in individuals testing positive for COVID-19 (0.01% of all patients vaccinated). ConclusionsThis study provides further evidence that a single dose of either the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine or the Oxford/Astrazeneca vaccine is effective at reducing the risk of testing positive for COVID-19 up to 60 days across all adult age groups, ethnic groups, and risk categories in an urban UK population. There was no difference in effectiveness up to 28 days between the Oxford/Astrazeneca and Pfizer/BioNtech vaccines. In those declining vaccination higher rates were seen in those living in the most deprived areas and in Black and Black British groups. There was no definitive evidence to suggest COVID-19 was transmitted as a result of vaccination hubs during vaccine the administration roll-out in NWL, and the risk of contracting COVID-19 and/or becoming hospitalised after vaccination has been demonstrated to be very low in the vaccinated population.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.0%
2
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.2%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
50% of probability mass above
5
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 36%
4.2%
7
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
9
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
10
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.6%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
14
BMJ Paediatrics Open
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
15
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
16
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
20
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
25
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
27
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
28
Archives of Disease in Childhood
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%