Back

Using the OHDSI network to develop and externally validate a patient-level prediction model for Heart Failure in Type II Diabetes Mellitus.

Williams, R. D.; Reps, J. M.; Kors, J. A.; Ryan, P. B.; Steyerberg, E.; Verhamme, K.; Rijnbeek, P. R.

2021-04-07 endocrinology
10.1101/2021.04.06.21254966 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionHeart Failure (HF) and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) frequently coexist and exacerbate symptoms of each other. Treatments are available for T2DM that also provide beneficial treatment effects for HF. Guidelines recommend that patients with HF should be given Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in preference to other second-line treatments for T2DM. Increasing personalization of treatment means that patients who have or are at risk of HF receive a customised treatment. We aimed to develop and externally validate prediction models to predict the 1-year risk of incident HF in T2DM patients starting second-line treatment. MethodsWe analysed a federated network of electronic medical records and administrative claims data from five databases (CCAE, MDCD, MDCR, Optum Clinformatics and Optum EHR) in the United States. We used each database to develop a model to predict 1-year risk of incident HF in patients initialising a second pharmaceutical intervention, following initial treatment with metformin for T2DM. We then performed internal validation for each model as well as external validation using the other databases. ResultsA total of 403,187 patients were included in the study. We developed 5 models with discrimination ranging from 0.72 to 0.80 at external validation in the other databases. Consistent high performance was noted for models developed in CCAE, Optum Clinformatics and Optum EHR with AUCs ranging from 0.74 to 0.81. For these models, calibration was acceptable. ConclusionThree high-performing prediction models were developed for this problem. The CCAE developed model was selected for recommendation as it achieved the same discrimination and better calibration performance than the Optum Clinformatics and Optum EHR models, whilst selecting fewer covariates and as such was selected as the best developed model. The models could be useful in stratifying patient treatment, planning healthcare utilization and reducing cost by aiding in increasing preparedness of healthcare providers.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 10%
17.7%
2
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
3
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
4
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
5
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.7%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.9%
8
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
9
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
13
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
16
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
26
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%