Back

A Tensegrity-Graph Optimization Framework for Estimating Intracellular Stiffness

Bhattacharya, R.

2021-04-04 biophysics
10.1101/2021.04.04.438371 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In this paper we present a formulation for estimating intracellular stiffness using tensegrity principles. We demonstrate that the new tensegrity model, based on random graphs over dense nodes, can predict well known mechanical characteristics of epithelial and mesenchymal cells.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.5%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
● 235 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Biophysical Journal
○ 631 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
Similar papers in this journal
5
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
Similar papers in this journal
6
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.4%
7
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Theoretical Biology
○ 162 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.5%
9
Physical Review E
● 112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
10
Physical Biology
○ 46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
12
The European Physical Journal E
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
13
Soft Matter
● 60 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
PRX Life
● 42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Cytoskeleton
○ 27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
Mathematical Biosciences
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
17
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
● 15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
19
New Journal of Physics
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
20
Acta Biomaterialia
○ 92 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
21
Physical Review Research
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
22
Journal of Mathematical Biology
○ 40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
Molecular Biology of the Cell
● 311 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
26
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.6%
27
npj Systems Biology and Applications
○ 125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.