Back

Higher Relative Viral Load Excretion Determined by Normalised Threshold Crossing Value in Acute Cases infected with the B.1.1.7 Lineage VOC 202012/01 (Using S gene target failure as a Proxy) When Compared to other Circulating Lineages in Wales

Couzens, A.; Murrell, I.; Johns, B.; Pheasant, K.; Turner, L.; Evans, J.; Moore, C.; Gifford, L.

2021-04-07 infectious diseases
10.1101/2021.04.02.21254832 medRxiv
Show abstract

Since the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, global monitoring of the virus using whole genome sequencing has identified mutations occurring across the viral genome. Whilst the majority have little impact on the virus, they are used effectively to monitor the movement of the virus globally and to inform locally on transmission chains. In late 2020, a variant of SARS-CoV-2 (B.1.1.7 - VOC 202012/01) was identified in the UK with a distinct constellation of mutations, including in the spike gene that increased transmissibility. A deletion in spike also affected one of the screening qPCR tests being used in the UK outside of Wales, causing a failure to detect the target. This quickly became a surrogate marker for the variant to allow rapid monitoring of the virus as it seeded into new regions of the UK. A screening study using this assay as a proxy marker, was undertaken to understand the prevalence of the variant in Wales. Secondary analysis of a screening qPCR that didnt target the S gene and also included an endogenous control, was also performed to understand viral load excretion in those infected with the variant compared to other circulating lineages. Using a combination of analytical methods based on the Ct values of two gene targets normalised against the endogenous control, there was a difference in the excreted viral load. Those with the variant excreting more virus than those not infected with the variant. Supporting not only increased infectivity but offering a plausible reason why increased transmission was associated with this particular variant. Whilst there are limitations in this study, the method using Ct as a proxy for viral load can be used at the population level to determine differences in viral excretion kinetics associated with different variants.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.7%
6
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
8
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
9
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Journal of General Virology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
12
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
19
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
20
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
21
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
22
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
23
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
24
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
25
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
26
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Access Microbiology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
28
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
30
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%