Back

Comparison of Type-1 and Type-2 Fuzzy Systems forMineralization of Bioprinted Bone

Sedigh, A.; Akbarzadeh-T, M.-R.; Tomlinson, R. E.

2021-03-31 bioinformatics
10.1101/2021.03.31.437908 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bioprinting is an emerging tissue engineering method used to generate cell-laden scaffolds with high spatial resolution. Bioprinting parameters, such as pressure, nozzle size, and speed, have a large influence on the quality of the bioprinted construct. Moreover, cell suspension density, cell culture period, and other critical biological parameters directly impact the biological function of the final product. Therefore, an approximation model that can be used to find the values of bioprinting parameters that will result in optimal bioprinted constructs is highly desired. Here, we propose type-1 and type-2 fuzzy systems to handle the uncertainty and imprecision in optimizing the input values. Specifically, we focus on the biological parameters, such as culture period, that can be used to maximize the output value (mineralization volume). To achieve a more accurate approximation, we have compared a type-2 fuzzy system with a type-1 fuzzy system using two levels of uncertainty. We hypothesized that type-2 fuzzy systems may be preferred in biological systems, due to the inherent vagueness and imprecision of the input data. Here, our results demonstrate that the type-2 fuzzy system with a high uncertainty boundary (30%) is superior to type-1 and type-2 with low uncertainty boundary fuzzy systems in the overall output approximation error for bone bioprinting inputs.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.2%
2
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 21%
5.0%
4
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
5
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.0%
8
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
10
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
13
Mathematical Biosciences
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.4%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Animals
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
22
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
25
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%