Back

Evaluation of solvents used for fabrication of microphysiological systems

Wen, X.; Takahashi, S.; Hatakeyama, K.; Kamei, K.-i.

2021-03-25 bioengineering
10.1101/2021.03.24.436761 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microphysiological systems (MPSs) have shown great promise for the advancement of drug discovery and toxicological tests, and as an alternative to animal models. However, although several chips and systems have been reported, some important issues are yet to be addressed, such as the use of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS). Cyclo olefin polymers (COPs) have advantages over other thermoplastic materials, but most COP-based MPSs use solvent bonding during fabrication, which can affect any cells they are used to culture. This study uses a photobonding process with vacuum ultraviolet (UVU) to produce MPSs without the need for solvents such as cyclohexane, dichloromethane, and toluene. This is then used for comparison to investigate the effects of solvents on cell cultures. Quantitative immunofluorescent assays show that the coating efficiencies of extracellular matrix proteins, such as Matrigel and collagen I, are reduced on solvent-treated COP surfaces, compared with those prepared using VUV photobonding. Furthermore, SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells are used to evaluate cytotoxicity. This shows that solvent-MPSs induce apoptosis, but VUV-MPSs do not. These results provide insights into solvent bonding for MPS fabrication so that undesirable reactions can be avoided. Moreover, this work may be used to standardize MPS protocols and establish good manufacturing practices.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Materials Technologies
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
3
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
5
Advanced Healthcare Materials
85 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
6
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biomaterials
84 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.8%
9
Materials Today Bio
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
12
ACS Applied Bio Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.7%
15
Advanced Functional Materials
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Bioactive Materials
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
Chemical Engineering Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Biomaterials Science
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
25
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
28
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
29
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%
30
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%