Back

Trends in clinical characteristics and associations of severe non-respiratory events related to SARS-CoV-2

El-Hay, T.; Karavani, E.; Perez, A.; Ninio, M.; Ravid, S.; Chorev, M.; Rosen-Zvi, M.; Patalon, T.; Shimoni, Y.; Jain, A.

2021-03-26 public and global health
10.1101/2021.03.24.21251900 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) is reported to result in both respiratory and non-respiratory severe health outcomes, but quantitative assessment of the risk - while adjusting for underlying risk driven by comorbidities - is not yet established. MethodsA retrospective observational study using electronic health records of 9,344,021 individuals across the U.S. with at-least 1 year of clinical history and followed up throughout 2020. Results131,329 individuals were associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection by January 6, 2021 in three distinct surges. While the age and number of preexisting conditions had decreased throughout the pandemic, the characteristics of those who experienced severe health events did not. During the second surge, between June 7 and November 18, 2020, 425,988 individuals in the base cohort were admitted to emergency rooms or hospitals. Among them, 15,486 were detected with SAR-CoV-2 within few days of admission. Significant adjusted odds ratios were observed between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the following severe health events: respiratory (4.38, 95% confidence interval 4.16- 4.62), bacterial pneumonia (3.25, 2.76-3.83), sepsis (1.71, 1.53-1.91), renal (1.69, 1.57-1.83), hematologic/immune (1.32, 1.20-1.45), neurological (1.23, 1.09-1.38). ConclusionsSARS-CoV-2 infection among hospitalized patients is associated with non-negligible increased risk of severe events including multiple non-respiratory ones. These associations, which complement recent studies, are persistent even after accounting for sources of selection and confounding bias, increasing the confidence they are not spurious.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.0%
2
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
4
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
10
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
11
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
12
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 61%
1.6%
14
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
15
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
16
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
19
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
20
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
24
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
26
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
28
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
British Journal of Anaesthesia
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.6%