Fecal Microbiome Of Children With Norovirus Gastroenteritis
Hernandez, J. M.; Junior, E. C. S.; Almeida, G. B. S.; Portela, A. C. R.; Lucena, M. S. S.; Cardoso, J. F.; Reymao, T. K. A.; Lima, C. P. S.; Nunes, M. R. T.; Teixeira, D. M.; Siqueira, J. A. M.; Gabbay, Y. B.; Silva, L. D.
Show abstract
The human fecal microbiome is composed of endogenous bacteria, eukaryotic viruses, bacteriophages and retroviruses. Several pathological conditions, including gastroenteritis, may be characterized by imbalance of gastrointestinal functions, with alteration in the diversity and composition of the fecal microbiota. Were analyzed twenty-seven fecal microbiome in children hospitalized with gastroenteritis (norovirus positive) from northern region of Brazil. After sequencing, was verified the presence of the domains Bacteria (95%) and Eukaryota (3.1%), the viruses represented 1.9%. Among the pathogenic viruses were found in addition to noroviruses the picornaviruses, enterovirus and parechovirus. The bacteriophages detected were of Caudovirales order, families Siphoviridae, Podoviridae and Myoviridae. In 22.2% (6/27) of the samples was observed co-infection between norovirus, enterovirus B and echovirus. As for the others components of the microbiome, we can highlight the presence of the taxonomic groups: Terrabacteria (50.2%), composed mainly of Actinobacteria and Firmicutes; Proteobacteria (34.5%) represented by the Enterobacteriaceae family; and FCB group (22%) whose most abundant microorganisms were those of the phylum Bacterioidetes. We performed a metagenomic approach to analyze the fecal microbiota of children with viral gastroenteritis, it was observed that the bacterias (Enterobacteriaceae) deserve attention in a possible association with noroviruses, as they were found in large quantities in infections. In addition, other enteric viruses were observed, such as enteroviruses.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Efficacy of fecal sampling as a gut proxy in the study of chicken gut microbiota 95%
- Gut Microbiome Functional and Taxonomic Diversity within an Amazonian semi-nomadic hunter-gatherer group 95%
- Model selection reveals the butyrate-producing gut bacterium Coprococcus eutactus as predictor for language development in three-year-old rural Ugandan children 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Signature Microbiota Driving Rumen Function Shifts in Goat Kids Introduced Solid Diet Regimes 93%
- Exploring the phytobeneficial and biocontrol capacities of endophytic bacteria isolated from hybrid vanilla pods 92%
- Cultivation-based quantification and identification of bacteria at two hygienic key sides of domestic washing machines 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncovering Changes in Microbiome Profiles Across Commercial and Backyard Poultry Farming Systems 94%
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes 94%
- Fecal and skin microbiota of two rescued Mediterranean monk seal pups during rehabilitation 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative metagenome-assembled genome analysis of Lachnovaginosum genomospecies, formerly known as BVAB1 92%
- Molecular Characterization of Vaginal Microbiota Using a New 22-Species qRT-PCR Test to Achieve a Relative-abundance and Species-based Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis 91%
- Molecular epidemiology and clone transmission of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in ICU rooms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of HIV infection and integrase strand transfer inhibitors-based treatment on gut virome 95%
- Gut microbial communities associated with phenotypically divergent populations of the striped stem borer Chilo suppressalis 94%
- Manually weighted taxonomy classifiers improve species-specific rumen microbiome analysis compared to unweighted or average weighted taxonomy classifiers 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.