Back

Comparative Multiomic Analysis Reveals Low T Cell Infiltration as the Primary Feature of Tobacco Use in HPV(+) Oropharyngeal Cancer

Wahle, B. M.; Zolkind, P.; Ramirez, R.; Skidmore, Z. L.; Mazul, A.; Hayes, D. N.; Sandulache, V. C.; Thorstad, W. L.; Adkins, D.; Griffith, O. L.; Griffith, M.; Zevallos, J. P.

2021-03-24 cancer biology
10.1101/2021.03.23.436478 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTobacco use is an independent adverse prognostic feature in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Despite this, the biologic features associated with tobacco use have not been systematically investigated in this population. We sought to characterize the genomic and immunologic features of HPV(+) OPSCC associated with tobacco use and adverse oncologic outcomes. Experimental DesignWhole exome sequencing of 47 primary HPV(+) OPSCC tumors was performed to investigate mutational differences associated with tobacco exposure. To characterize the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), targeted mRNA hybridization was performed and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was used to validate these findings. ResultsLow expression of transcripts in a T cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TGEP) was associated with tobacco use at the time of diagnosis and lower overall and disease-free survival. Tobacco use was associated with an increased proportion of T>C substitutions and a lower proportion of mutational signatures typically observed in HPV(+) OPSCC tumors, but was not associated with increases in mutational burden or the rate of recurrent oncogenic mutations. ConclusionsIn HPV(+) OPSCC, low T cell infiltration of primary tumors is associated with current tobacco use and worse oncologic outcomes. Rather than an increased mutational burden, tobaccos primary and clinically relevant association is immunosuppression of the primary TIME. An objective clinical assay like the TGEP, which quantifies immune infiltration of the primary TIME, may have value for HPV(+) OPSCC risk stratification in future clinical trials.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.0%
2
Cancer Research Communications
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.3%
3
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
4
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
9
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
10
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.0%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.0%
12
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.0%
13
NAR Cancer
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Annals of Oncology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
16
OncoImmunology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
19
Molecular Cancer Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
21
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
British Journal of Dermatology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Viruses
332 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Experimental Dermatology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%